Daconil/Chlorothalonil different rates???
korney19
14 years ago
Featured Answer
Sort by:Oldest
Comments (35)
star_stuff
14 years agokorney19
14 years agoRelated Discussions
How often can I apply Daconil?
Comments (1)There's a lot of math involved, and the first thing you would need to know is how much any given volume of the product weighs. After you get your answer in how many pounds of the product you can apply per acre, you need to know how much product is in the volume you mixed and how you're going to deal with the transition between 'per acre' and 'per plant'. IOW, after you do the calculations, there is no way to apply them. If it's not in the literature on the label, I'd call Ortho and ask them how often you can/should use it. Al...See MoreDaconil
Comments (20)I think YOU are the one throwing insults around. Some estimates go up to 80% overweight. For "obesity", the confirmed figures are forty to fifty per cent. The SAD, or Standard American Diet is certifiably known to be the most toxic diet on earth. The comment was NOT directed as an insult but listed for comparison purposes in the general discussion of toxcicity -- THE LESS TOXINS OF ANY KIND and FROM ANY SOURCE, THE BETTER. Each and every ingredient listed as contained in any given processed food has also likely, itself, undergone many processing steps . "Overweight" is a EUPHEMISM, here, for the innumerable problems existing as a result of the Standard American Diet, or "SAD" -- pointing out the fact that most people in the US feed toxic, processed foods to their children can hardly be ascribed the status of "a thrown in insult". You're not just being insulting you're imputing ! So far as error, you list many differnt instances as a whole, long string of citations in order to weight your arguement against any single one of them AND the persons who posted them (none of whom claim, in the first place, to be an expert or authority in any branch of science or law) -- a device know in the study of rhetoric by the technical term "Climax". Your words also impute foolhardiness, negligence, wrongfulness to the commentor. BUT YOU'RE THE ONE WRONG. And you DO claim irrefutable authority ! And you're plain wrong about the smoking statement, too ! A cigarette smoker already carries AWARENESS of the very real "possibility" of toxic exposure -- but the point being make here is : MOST non-smokers are AWARE of repeated, continual (and alarming) health warnings -- so THEY view smokers as stupid people who wrongfully partake of a dangerous and regulated substance. As if smokers had no first hand knowledge and awareness, and as if ENVIRONMENTAL TOXINS were something separate in the lungs than "stupid" cigarette smoke. YOU RAIL AGAINST WHAT YOU CALL "BLATANT" misinformation or errors -- again, an INSULTING IMPUTATION of your own, considering that the word "errors" would be sufficient and adequate to the meaning of your sentence -- AND THE ITEMS YOU GO ON TO LIST ARE NOT EVEN ERRORS -- IT IS YOUR OWN STATEMENTS THAT MISINFORM the decently concerned person, a person who, likely and suitablY, seeks to lessen the TOTAL AMOUNT OF TOXIC EXPOSURE FOR THEMSELVES AND OTHERS. For example, Wikipedia states that when Daconil breaks down in the environment, it becomes THIRTY TIMES MORE TOXIC than it was at the time of it's application. For another -- THIS SUBSTANCE HAS IN FACT BE BANNED AND PROHIBITED in other parts of the globe. BANNED. NOW WHICH COMMENTS SHOULD BEAR YOUR FAIRY-TALE CALUMNIES ? "BLATANT", "ERROR", "MISINFORMATION" ! "THROWN IN", eh ?. YOU HAVE THROWN IN A LITTLE MORE THAN INSULTS, AND, PLEASE REMEMBER, THOSE WERE NO INSULTS IN THE FIRST PLACE. NOT ONLY DO YOU ATTACK OTHERS WHILE BEING THE ONE ACTUALLY IN ERROR -- YOU......See MoreCorn Meal -vs- Chlorothalonil
Comments (10)'I've researched this for most of the morning, and the only evidence I can find when applied to turfgrasses seems to be anecdotal. ... I would be interested to see a real turfgrass study as it relates to cornmeal, if anyone can find one. Might want to brush up on your researching skills :) See the link below. The discovery of Corn Gluten Meal as a pre-emergent started out as research into the use of natural methods to control Pythium in golf course greens. The Pythium didn't establish in the cornmeal treated plots. They also noticed that the fresh cornmeal plot had poorer germination which later research revealed corn gluten was 'The Pythium was cultured in the laboratory for several weeks on the commeal and then taken to the field area where it was placed on the surface and tilled 3 to 4 inches deep. Along with the inoculated cornmeal plots, plots of the same size were treated with fresh cornmeal that had not been treated with Pythium. The same total amount of cornmeal was used in the two separate treatments. In addition. a third control plot to which no cornmeal had been applied was established. Three cultivars of creeping bentgrass then were seeded in strips over the top of the plots. The attempt ro establish Pythium in the treated plots was a failure, and normal germination occurred in those areas. Normal germination also was observed in the control plots. However, in the plots that had received the fresh cornmeal, establishment was reduced greatly.' Here's a study on cornstarch against brown patch in st augustine with favorable results. http://agfacts.tamu.edu/D11/Victoria/AG/HomeHort/LANDSCAP/nbrwnpch.htm 'The cornmeal is claimed to provide food (starch) for the good bacteria in the turfgrass which themselves feed on the Brown Patch disease organisms. There was a trend for the cornmeal treated turfgrass to look better than the untreated check and even better than the terrachlor plots.' If you regularly treat your lawn with synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, it is possible that the bacteria cornmeal feeds won't be present? Here is a link that might be useful: Corn Gluten Meal Discover...See MoreOrtho Garden Disease Control (Daconil) ? Organic?
Comments (63)Britt you have distorted Kimm's statement (" If you really have gardened that many years, with a wide variety of plants, you would have had some diseases to deal with, and certainly at least some losses." - my putting part of your statement in bold). Kimm's statement "even a small part of one" does not mean "none - zero". See: http://dictionary.reverso.net/english-definition/small%20part You have taken a statement to an extreme. In debating, there is a name for such a practice. https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#newwindow=1&q=trying+to+take+an+argument+to+the+extreme I am reproducing your conclusion here. " Kimm, you should not lie about organic gardening benefits: they are substantial, and can stand on their own. There is no need to make unsubstantiated fantastic clams." A breakdown in logic: at first you bring up the possibility of someone lying: "is a remark that either is a total lie, or indicates that you have just not tried many things. " Then you make the above conclusion statement. ==================================================== In my rose growing years, I (Henry Kuska) grew 1000 roses and I could make the same statement that Kimm made....See Morestar_stuff
14 years agoPandorae
14 years agocarolyn137
14 years agoellenr22 - NJ - Zone 6b/7a
14 years agopotterhead2
14 years agomulio
14 years agoellenr22 - NJ - Zone 6b/7a
14 years agoellenr22 - NJ - Zone 6b/7a
14 years agokorney19
14 years agojustaguy2
14 years agocarolyn137
14 years agodaveinco
14 years agoliz63
14 years agoFred_in_Maine
14 years agobigdaddyj
14 years agomulio
14 years agobigdaddyj
14 years agokorney19
14 years agokorney19
14 years agomulio
14 years agoellenr22 - NJ - Zone 6b/7a
14 years agoliz63
14 years agokorney19
14 years agoellenr22 - NJ - Zone 6b/7a
14 years agolkittle
14 years agomacsmiley
14 years agojtcm05
14 years agodrtomato
14 years agoliz63
14 years agomiesenbacher
14 years agoalgbas
10 years agoseysonn
10 years ago
Sponsored
avid_hiker