I am not fond of this. It is an early-2000s time-stamped house--better than the 1990s houses, but not by much. What I dislike is all the clutter at the front. It's trying to evoke the past, but gables used to be for a reason, not just for visual clutter. I'd clean it up substantially. I'd take the front down to two gables, total. Bumping out the gables won't cost hardly a thing because it'll simplify roofline and foundation. That means that the gable on the L will stick out farther, and the porch on the R will continue the entire width of the gable. Right now, the only purpose of the extra gables is to be a surface for more trim and materials. Even at the most insane excesses of the 19th century, there were never such abortive movements in architecture. If there was a tower, it was a tower, dangit. If you're going to have a gable, have a real GABLE, not some sad little thing pinned onto the front like a flower. For the love of all that's holy, DO NOT!!!!!!!!!! brick/stone veneer just the front of the gable and have Hardiplank on the sides. That looks kitschy and cheap--far cheaper than being honest with your materials and just using hardie all around. It's like any gable that's less than 3' deep--or even 5' deep. It looks like the effort was made but there was no conviction, no carry-through. If you want it to look authentic and still mix materials, put stone on the connecting wing between the gables and hardiplank on the rest of the house but with a stone foundation. The shingles can then go only in the gables without looking too busy. Just like Macv said, that makes a story: The connecting wing (ell) was the original modest house, made from the native stone that was dug from the fields where the house was built. (It's a romantic design for a house--it must have a properly romantic story!). In the 1880s, it was added on to as the family grew wealthier, using the fashions of the day (if a wee bit behind the times--these were very comfortable but somewhat provincial people), and what little of the stone remained was used for the foundation. The shutters on this house are all shown installed wrong, and they are the wrong size. The gable shutters should be replaced by a single shutter, the twin windows' should be installed so they at least LOOK like they'd work, and the narrow window needs a single shutter while the big windows either need none or folding shutters. For that matter, the sidelites, as pictured, dont' go with the house. I'd expect bigger molding around the door with the way the windows are treated, and I'd shutter the sidelites if everything else got shutters. Click on this link for some inspiration. Note that the original shutters for this house were lost, and there's cheap stick-on shutters instead. :-( But it still has a LOT of bones, and you can see that simplicity in pattern isn't always bad. Here is a link that might be useful:

Thanks Leelee and SJ McCarthy, The tile place says they will exchange the polished tiles for the honed ones. I agree with both of you, if I do the same tiles on floor, wainscoting wall and shower it will look more cohesive. I have a lot of tiles that are almost plain white, I will use these for the wainscoting wall behind the freestanding tub. This will make the room look not so busy. The shower is in another room so I’m not worried about the tile mismatch anymore. The new honed tiles are from the same lot as the previous tiles so hopefully it’s the same tones, beige, gold and greens.

I love your house. Paint it all black fox by sherwin williams, the contrast will make your brick appear whiter. I might replace the garage door with something more interesting since it’s a prominent feature.

Sofa or sectional? Find something you love, then decide. Not sure if you've seen this site: https://www.roveconcepts.com/about.html Might be a over budget: https://benchmademodern.com/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMI4MKGgJWM7QIVCI3ICh38jwOREAAYASAAEgIn1PD_BwE