Contractor dilemma on new ADU build on existing home.

2 months ago

We recently contracted with a guy to build a new ADU attached directly to an existing home. The build is almost done and when I got onto the roof I noticed that the materials used and the design of the roof was not what was specified in the plans. The roofing notes on the blueprints for the roof specifically state "Sure-White EPDM" from a specific company but the materials used is not that, he used the cheapest materials for roofing, it's a flat roof so the notes specifically state for a particular type of material EPDM, we also noticed that the roofer didn't build the pitch correctly and put two scuppers instead of one with the water channels going directly into one scupper. We noticed that the roof isn't draining properly and it's got water puddles 3-4 days after a rain. I brought it to his attention but he insists that it's done correctly and that it will be ok. I disagree and we're about done with the build and should be coming up on our final inspections with the city inspector here soon. What should we do? Do we have any recourse and what would the best plan of action be?

Sort by:Oldest

Comments (7)

Krista Deng
2 months ago
It sounds like the contractor has deviated from the plans and specifications for the roof of the ADU. This is a cause for concern, especially since the roof is not draining properly and has water puddles forming after a rain. It is important to address this issue before the final inspections with the city inspector.

The first step would be to review the contract that was signed with the contractor to see if there are any provisions that address deviations from the plans or specifications. If there are, then you may be able to pursue legal action against the contractor.

In addition, it would be a good idea to get an independent opinion from a licensed and experienced roofing contractor. They can inspect the roof and provide an unbiased assessment of the quality of the work and whether it meets the specifications outlined in the plans.

If it is determined that the contractor did not follow the plans and specifications, then you may be able to withhold payment or negotiate a lower payment to compensate for the cost of correcting the work. Alternatively, you may need to take legal action to recover any damages incurred.

It is important to address these issues as soon as possible to avoid any further problems or delays in completing the ADU. You may want to consult with a lawyer who specializes in construction law to help you navigate the process and protect your interests.
3onthetree
2 months ago
The city is not a third party in reviewing what materials were installed vs the construction documents. It would actually be best to not have an final CO or Substantial inspection done until this issue is cleared up, because the contractor will use that as an excuse to not do anything.

A manufacturer's representative of the installed product can verify the workmanship as it relates to warranty, or a third paid party if there is no one for that. Whether or not your contract allows or doesn't allow equivalent substitutions doesn't mean it is worth your time or lawyer's money to have it replaced. You should have the person who spec'd your roof review the installed product to see if it is equivalent.
Related Discussions
Floor Plan Design Dilemma for New Build (Need Architect Advice)
Q
Comments (158)
In Ontario any homeowner can submit their own drawings, however, they will be reviewed by the planning department to ensure the drawings meet code. However, a professional I,e, draftsman, designer, architectural technologist etc must complete and pass exams and thus obtain a (Building code identification no) BCIN. An architect does not require a BCIN, however, they must be licensed in the province in order to have construction drawings approved. Some further explanations http://www.andythomson.ca/2016/11/15/why-a-bcin-is-not-an-architect/
...See More
Is Building new Home always cheaper than purchasing an existing home?
Q
Comments (11)
I suspect that this question really can't be answered in any meaningful way without very specific information. In general, buying an existing home is cheaper than building a home, however, renovating is much more expensive than building. So the question becomes at what point are the costs of remodeling greater than the savings from buying existing, and the answer is simply not that concrete. For starters, some homes lend themselves to additions much better than other homes. Siding vs. brick, crawlspace vs. slab, etc. Additionally, there is the location problem. While it might be cheaper to build a house on an available lot, the total cost of ownership for a more suitably placed home might be lower. Parks, schools, groceries, etc. within walking distance will often make a house more suitable and lower commuter costs sufficiently to make up for the marginal costs of remodeling. Not to mention general quality of life issues when the location of a home enhances the way you live. Finally, depending on location, lot development can be a pretty important consideration. I have personally paused my home design as I labor over an extraordinary piece of property. It is absolutely everything I want, however, it is going to cost me seven figures just to develop the property into something I can build a house on, so those costs can be significant if no satisfactory lots are available. ---------------- As others have said, assuming there is a satisfactory larger home available, it will always be cheaper to find a way to acquire that rather than remodeling, however, if nothing works, you might not have many options. At some point a tear down starts making a lot of sense. I suspect your friends are actually naive about the costs of remodeling and are overvaluing the infrastructure available. However, we should allow that, that might not be the case.
...See More
Building a new house- kitchen Design dilemma!
Q
Comments (41)
No the other plan is no better. It's still fat with more than 2 rooms deep and with no way to have windows in the main rooms on 2 walls. The outside corner in the master is taken up not with the bedroom but the closet and bathroom. The kitchen has NO natural light and the main room has windows only on one wall. In fact the pantry which shouldn't have a window, is at the front with a window while the kitchen is in a dark hole. The flow sucks. Look at the path from the front door to the master bedroom for example. A walk in pantry can be a good thing but it has to fit within the house. If you want to see some well designed houses take a look at what architectrunnerguy does. And not a single fat house.
...See More
Reverse ADU with new home.
Q
Comments (3)
Look up Kol and his Portland, OR DADU. He built a lovely DADU on the back of his property and rents out the front house. He is a great advocate of DADUs in general and is featured on several blogs which would be a great resource for you on this.
...See More
Franklin
2 months ago
Almost all contracts allow ”equivalent materials” to be substituted for expediency or other reasons. Read your contract.
Kendrah
2 months ago
Almost all contracts allow ”equivalent materials” to be substituted for expediency or other reasons. Read your contract.

I have never had a contract say this and if I did, I would either insist it be taken out of the contract or I wouldn't sign it.

I don't know how much the cost of roof construction is but it seems you could spend that much or more in legal fees.

I agree it is prudent to hold off on the city inspection until this is resolved as not to muddy the waters between a job finished or not.
DeWayne
2 months ago
Not building the slope correctly is your big issue. Focus on that.
chispa
2 months ago
We did a custom build and crossed out the "equivalent material" wording in the contract before we signed it. Our builder didn't have a problem with that change. It didn't mean we weren't open to substitutions, just that they needed to be discussed with us and we could then make a decision together with the builder.
PRO
Sabrina Alfin Interiors
2 months ago
Who is the architect who designed the plans and did the specifications? They should be the one reviewing the materials chosen and also determining whether the roof pitch was done correctly. I'd bring them in ASAP.

Contractor dilemma on new ADU build on existing home.

Comments (7)

Krista Deng

3onthetree

Related Discussions

Franklin

Kendrah

DeWayne

chispa

Sabrina Alfin Interiors

COMPANY

BUSINESS SERVICES

GET HELP

CONNECT WITH US