SHOP PRODUCTS
Houzz Logo Print
nekotish

Bridesman or...?

nekotish
last year

My daughter who is engaged is having a party tonight to ask her intended attendants to be attendants. Her twin sister will be her MOH and her two best friends along with a uni friend will be bridesmaids - except one of them is a male. He has been with her through thick and thin and she would never dream of excluding him. So, we have seen that the word bridesman is used in such a situation. My daughter keeps saying it makes her think of woodsman. Has anyone heard of a better word? This will be an informal, inclusive wedding so she is thinking of a term for when people ask who her bridesmaids will be. I said to ask him and she said she will but right now when people ask who her bridesmaids will be, she says "my attendants will be (fake names here) Sally, Beth, Joseph and Stephanie." Should we just stick with the words attendants? He will wear a suit or whatever that is in line with what the groomsmen will be wearing.

Comments (31)

  • bpath
    last year
    last modified: last year

    “Attendants” is just fine.

    nekotish thanked bpath
  • mojomom
    last year

    I agree — Attendants is the word! Good for your DD for following her heart and not outdated traditions!

    nekotish thanked mojomom
  • mtnrdredux_gw
    last year

    either works


    so sweet

    nekotish thanked mtnrdredux_gw
  • Bookwoman
    last year

    My daughter had her best male friend from college as one of her attendants. It was great to see him up there.

    nekotish thanked Bookwoman
  • morz8 - Washington Coast
    last year

    I like the description 'attendant'. Would he have a preference? She could ask him....

    nekotish thanked morz8 - Washington Coast
  • colleenoz
    last year

    I’d go with “attendant” as well.

  • 3katz4me
    last year

    She already figured it out with no help from us.

  • arcy_gw
    last year

    "Outdated" not really this is a group that has included all bffs regardless, for so long now to be affronted by what used to be is just no longer worth the energy as it's no longer set in stone. Attendants works. I've seen on programs "Standing up for the couple today" and the list of names. I always like when they tell us cousins or siblings in the list. There is just no reason to define the dress wearers vs the tux's. Everyone knows!! "Wedding party" would also work. With all the diversity one would assume your daughter's isn't the first, so she would have run into it before, what has she seen other's do? I really take insult to the 'this is an inclusive wedding' NEVER have I heard anyone say "This is a wedding for friends and family that won't include this that or the other thing." uggg. It's just sooo tacky to be so in your face with personal information.

  • Ally De
    last year

    Sigh. 🙁 So in your world it isn't "in your face with personal information" to list family members in the program - but it IS unacceptable to use the word inclusive.


    Arcy, you genuinely make my heart hurt.

  • Toronto Veterinarian
    last year

    "Attendants" also nicely negates the need for the word "bridesmaid", because sometimes "bridesmaids" are not maids (unmarried) but matrons (married). Best to do away with all those terms, in my opinion.

  • Jilly
    last year

    Attendants is perfect!

    Congrats to your daughter. ❤️

  • Ded tired
    last year

    I guess Bridesbutler isnt going to work. 😉

  • beesneeds
    last year

    How about paranymph? Old school, Greek. It can apply to all the attendents.

  • katlan
    last year

    Or maybe brides attendants?

  • Sueb20
    last year

    DS is having a female on his side but I guess it’s easier for him bc ”usher” can be male or female. She is making her own dress to match the other ushers’ tuxes. I can’t wait to see it. Fun fact, she’s also walking their dogs down the aisle.

    nekotish thanked Sueb20
  • bpath
    last year

    What is an inclusive wedding? Is it when you invite cousin Junie even though no on has spoken to her since that unforunate incident at the barbecue?

  • Ida Claire
    last year
    last modified: last year

    Your daughter sounds like the type of person I try to surround myself with these days, because it's simply a joy to be with people who have open minds and loving hearts. I would say that I hope she has an amazing, memorable wedding, but I think that’s already a given. And yes, attendants is the perfect term.


    ETA: "Inclusive" is a beautiful word that matters now more than ever before. Please continue to find ways to use it. I rewrote an organizational mission statement recently to emphasize that word.

  • beesneeds
    last year

    Maybe inclusive can be including guests who don't know who all the wedding party is. That would make most weddings inclusive. Heck, I've been in wedding party where I didn't know all of the other party members, just some of them.

    First time I got married was over 20 years ago. My husband wanted his best female friend in the wedding party. She stood on his side. I had a male friend stand on my side. We didn't really title our attendants except for the two Honors. Everyone was pretty much first name. Didnt have wedding programs either.

    I've been to non-inclusive weddings, and my second wedding was one. Also can be known as child free weddings. Usually it's on the invite that children are not included in the day.

    I've not been to a wedding where pets have been part of it.... yet. But hey, people have been including horses in weddings for ages, why not other pets.

    A wedding I was at a couple years ago was a literal inclusion wedding. A very small backyard wedding. The bride and groom came out. Their two Honors stood. Close friends and family were called to stand. Then an invite for everyone else to stand if they desired. Everyone stood for the couple :) It was rather lovely. Very short ceremony. It was a mature couple, first marriage. Invited people they very much knew. Then all of us who didn't know each other yet sat around making friends over a pig roast all night.

  • Sherry8aNorthAL
    last year

    I think the word "attendants" needs to be used for every wedding party for for both the bride and groom, whether they are male, female, Vulcan, or Hobbit.

    To me, inclusive means anyone and everyone important to the bride or groom or their family.

  • hhireno
    last year

    I attended an outdoor wedding where the dogs were escorted down the aisle and were listed in the program with a title like flower girls. Then they were allowed to roam, and annoy the seated guests. I like dogs but I don’t want one sniffing me and leaving a cloud of dog hair on me when I’m trying to view a wedding ceremony.

    The minister had to just about snap his fingers in the faces of the couple and yell ”FOCUS!” because the bridal couple were paying more attention to what the dogs were doing than to what he was saying.

  • nekotish
    Original Author
    last year

    By using the word inclusive, I simply meant that everyone there will be of the mind that "you love who you love." I didn't bother saying that the male attendant is gay or that there will be same sex couples in attendance because who cares? Unfortunately there is still rampant homophobia in existence. My daughter has an aquaintence that when getting married was asked by her mother not to invite a same sex couple so as not to "shock Grandma." That is not inclusive.

  • OllieJane
    last year
    last modified: last year

    I think either works also.

    By stating it is inclusive...is already making it divisive. If you even have to use the word, it is dividing people. Either all invited (people your daughter wants there in the first place) want to come, or they don't. No need to state "inclusive" in describing the event.

  • woodrose
    last year

    I agree with OllieJane, when you throw the word "inclusive" out there, you're causing problems that aren't necessary. Without that word, this would have been a nice, peaceful discussion about a wedding.

  • Tina Marie
    last year

    Sounds like a lovely plan Nekotish! I love to see the pets included in the wedding. How did the party go last night?

  • colduphere
    last year

    When people find the word inclusive to be insulting, it proves that we need to intentionally use inclusive language loudly and proudly. As Ida Claire said, its a beautiful word and we need it now more than ever.


    “Attendant” is perfect. Best wishes to your daughter and her fiancé!

    nekotish thanked colduphere
  • mtnrdredux_gw
    last year

    I don't think Nekotish is saying the invite says "inclusive;" she is just trying to give you a feel for the vibe and the census. Fake controversy.

    nekotish thanked mtnrdredux_gw
  • nekotish
    Original Author
    last year

    Last time to comment on this post. I used the word inclusive because there have been people that have said "wouldn't it just be easier for "Joseph" to be a groom's attendant? Yes folks, it is still happening.

  • Ida Claire
    last year

    May it be a blessed occasion. Sending you love. 💓

    nekotish thanked Ida Claire
  • Trapped
    last year

    My daughter had a male attendant 25 years ago. Several people thought he might have been a last minute stand in for someone who got sick (my husband's sister) I don't remember it being an issue at all.

  • WittyNickNameHere ;)
    last year

    Bridesman, Best Man, Attendant. They're all the same thing if he's standing up with her.

0