Houzz Logo Print
taltalita

Different painters proposing different solutions to calcimine ceiling?

2 years ago

Really hoping for clarity here... We have a 100 year old house with calcimine ceilings. Three large rooms in particular (dining room and two larger bedrooms) are in bad shape, with lots of cracking and some peeling. That said, some areas of the ceilings are fine (some rooms are worse / better than others). All the paint looked good when we moved in 10 years ago, thanks to touchups - we found the painter who did it...


We had 4 companies come in, and ended up with three different proposals, varying in price of course. Each claiming theirs is the way to do it. We have no idea who's telling us the right approach. Help???


(1) Scrape only the peeling/cracked areas, then apply a bonding layer, then repaint over everything. Claim is that the areas that look fine now won't start peeling in a year because they're fine (we've been here 10 years), so only the areas that are cracking / peeling need scraping and a bonding layer.


(2) Scrape everything (the whole ceiling), apply a bonding layer (or two, I forget), then apply the Benjamin Moore calcimine paint as the last layer. Apparently has bad VOCs for a few hours, and also lots of dust from the scraping (the kids and one parent can be away that week, but there will still be cats and one person staying behind in the house).


(3) Most expensive: new sheetrock for all the ceilings. We have some crown molding, so it's quite an expensive solution.


If the cheap option (1) with the least dust and scraping is good enough, obviously that's what we'd want. But not sure I trust it to last?
For option (2), how bad is the dust / VOCs? Does it work long term? We'd like it to look good for at least 12 years...
Would really love some insight. It's so confusing when different professionals all claim with absolute confidence that their approach is the only long lasting correct one...

Comments (4)