nc-crn said: "MUCH OF IT WAS SAID BY ME MONTHS EARLIER IN THIS THREAD AND YOU DISMISS THEM THEN AND NOW." H.Kuska comment. On Mon, Feb 25, 13 at 20:30 I requested the following: "I started the thread and linked to a specific paper by Jonathan Latham and Allison Wilson . I have attempted to keep the conversation focused first on that paper and then later on the other links that I proved in my initial post . As far as I can determine, even the last post is only partially on the points that are in my initial links (and no references were presented). To keep this thread on track, If someone feels that they have points about my initial post, please put the material in quotes from the link that you are discussing." You have now made the above (in captial letters) statement about the new paper that I have presented with no quotes of statements that you have made to back up your claims. After my first post you presented a post from another thread. I replied: "nc-crn, your cut and paste from an earlier discussion is interesting, but it does not appear to address most of the concerns brought up in the main link that I gave ("The paper linked to in the "Here is a link that might be useful" box has 124 comments which the reader may find interesting.") . " I then specifically pointed out to you what I was concerned about: "The following is a quote from the link that indicates what they are concerned about: "The Many Functions of Gene VI Gene VI, like most plant viral genes, produces a protein that is multifunctional. It has four (so far) known roles in the viral infection cycle. The first is to participate in the assembly of virus particles. There is no current data to suggest this function has any implications for biosafety. The second known function is to suppress anti-pathogen defenses by inhibiting a general cellular system called RNA silencing (Haas et al. 2008). Thirdly, Gene VI has the highly unusual function of transactivating (described below) the long RNA (the 35S RNA) produced by CaMV (Park et al. 2001). Fourthly, unconnected to these other mechanisms, Gene VI has very recently been shown to make plants highly susceptible to a bacterial pathogen (Love et al. 2012). Gene VI does this by interfering with a common anti-pathogen defense mechanism possessed by plants. These latter three functions of Gene VI (and their risk implications) are explained further below:" Your replies were/are mainly centered around the allegery function: "Gene VI Is a Unique Transactivator of Gene Expression.......The result will presumably be production of numerous random proteins within cells. The biosafety implications of this are difficult to assess. These proteins could be allergens, plant or human toxins, or they could be harmless. Moreover, the answer will differ for each commercial crop species into which Gene VI has been inserted." The first is to participate in the assembly of virus particles. There is no current data to suggest this function has any implications for biosafety." The above fixation on possible allegery problems (by you)is indicated in your next reply: "In order for a P6 allergen danger to manifest itself, which most people are not allergic to, it would have to happen in a plant which had a DNA replication error and happened to fix a P6 protein. A person who's susceptible to the allergy would also happen to ingest the mutated plant's grain...which would be a very small chance given how much grain is mixed with the rest of the crop or harvested grain in an elevator." In the same post you think that you are answering the "Gene VI Interferes with Host Defenses" and possibly the "Gene VI Is an Inhibitor of RNA Silencing" points made by Jonathan Latham and Allison Wilson by stateing: "In order for the mutated plant to become susceptible to infections the same replication error (including a proofreading not correcting it) would have to happen and the plant would have to actually contract an illness. This would effect the plants and could effect the surrounding plants." Please compare your answer to what the last paper reports. Timewise this takes us to my Mon, Feb 25, 13 at 20:30 post pointing out the other concerns which I feel are addressed in the new published, reviewed scientific paper that I just presented : ""Title: Identification of the domains of cauliflower mosaic virus protein P6 responsible for suppression of RNA silencing and salicylic acid signalling" -------------------------------------- They specifically put the two papers that I felt were important into their conclusion. ------------------------------------- When plant virus fragments get into humans, there is the possibility that our bodies will attempt to fight them just as they fight human viruses ( RNA silencing and salicylic acid signalling). The following article may be of interest on this point: "Humans Have Antibodies against a Plant Virus: Evidence from Tobacco Mosaic Virus" ( Published: April 03, 2013) http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0060621 ------------------------------------- . Here is a link that might be useful: corrected link to the broken link in first post.

First, I'm surprised the appraiser communicated with you directly. That wasn't allowed for us and we were very concerned. BUT he/she could communicate with our builder so he made sure they knew relevant details. We had a problem with the first lender we tried using. Their plan was to sell the loan so there could only be a certain variance in the adjustments made against the comps. It was a learning process for us. We knew there would be big adjustments because the available comps were sketchy in relevance. We learned the hard way - after paying for that failed appraisal. It helped us though when we went to a local bank that said they wouldn't sell the loan. We had that really good appraisal with the big adjustments to the comps that our builder (not us remember, we were forbidden to directly communicate) could discuss with the new appraiser. Miraculously, the new appraisal had much more relevant comps and we ended up with an even more favorable appraisal. The appraisal process is frustrating, a potential dead end and mostly out of your control.

It is great that you run your business with an open mind and some flexibility. Some businesses feel that they have to get every penny from the customer and aren't willing to take part of a project. I had a problem like that with an Interior Designer who took offense to any reasearch I did and charged us to fix errors she had caused. Luckily I found another Designer who is happy to let me do a lot of my research and then is my consultant for final choices ... a win/win for both of us.

Presumably the panel you have on it is the same as the original. Keybuttons to access diagnostics functions are different on the various panels. -- Machine turned off. Press/hold Auto Dry Down, then press Power at the same time. Release both when the panel activates. Press Power to exit diagnostics. Or disconnect the power cord for several seconds. There are several levels of diagnostics. Most of them are for engineering development and factory testing, not useful for operational troubleshooting. Auto Dry Up and Down buttons switch between levels. Initial is level 0. -- Last Fault is level 3. Press Auto Dry Up three times. Fault code is displayed in binary via the Drying Progress LEDs. There are 22 fault codes so I'll list them in following reply. -- Sensor bars test is level 5. Press Auto Dry Up two more times. Or exit Diagnostics, start over, and press it five times. Touch a damp cloth or your fingers across the sensor bars, the pattern of LEDs on the panel should change as moisture is registered and then dissipates when the bars are not touched. There is a Data Download mode for use with an optical reader tool. I imagine you don't have one ... but it's accessed by entering diagnostic mode and pressing the Regular cycle button. The reader is placed at the red Auto Sensing LED. There is a Showroom Mode, which flashes the panel LEDs randomly to attract attention in a store display. Cycles can presumably be set but the machine won't start. Disconnect the power cord or toggle the breakers off to exit Showroom Mode.