"Sulfur would be my second choice b'c it just isn't as effective." Carolyn, I have never heard this before--do you have a source? I always see sulfur listed as a primary control on various university sites. I always consider it first when I think of powdery mildew. Ray, I would not consider sulfur against septoria or early blight so if you are trying to prevent these diseases as well as powdery mildew you could use Daconil (unless you want to say you are growing organically). For the treatment of PM alone sulfur is considered an effective option. Follow label as per temperature restrictions. You would want to use other fungicides for other diseases but it is a good idea to alternate anyway. Here is a 1998 study by the Univ. of Conn. that evaluated 5 fungicides for controlling PM. Sulfur was considered superior over Daconil (Bravo) (chlorothalonil). ""We recently evaluated the efficacy of five fungicides for control of powdery mildew under field conditions in Windsor, CT. On 2 Jun, 1998, five plants of Celebrity tomato were transplanted per plot to each of 5 replicate field plots in 3 rows 5 ft apart with 2 ft between plants in each plot. Two additional untreated border rows were planted to act as a source of inoculum. Plants were staked and tied but not pruned or suckered. Tomato plots were left unsprayed or treated with either sulfur (Kumulus, 15 lb/A), benomyl (Benlate®, 12 oz/A), chlorothalonil (Bravo®, 1.5 lb/A), copper hydroxide (Kocide®, 2 lb/A), or azoxystrobin (Quadris®, 5.6 fl. oz/A) on 24 Jul, 7 Aug, 20 Aug, and 4 Sep. Plants were evaluated for percent foliage with powdery mildew on 10 Aug, 31 Aug, and 10 Sep. Ripening tomatoes were harvested from plots on 25 Aug, 3 Sep. 10 Sep, and 17 Sep. Data were analyzed by the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis analysis at P=0.05. Severe powdery mildew developed in the border plants and spread to the field plots (Table 1). Other foliar diseases, such as Septoria and Alternaria leaf spots, were low in incidence and not seen in the field plots or borders until late in the season. All fungicides evaluated resulted in less powdery mildew than developed in untreated control plots. Sulfur and Benlate® had superior efficacy early in the season, and Benlate® and Quadris® were superior at the late evaluation. Bravo® and Kocide® were intermediate in efficacy. While the trend was for lower yield in unsprayed plots, there were no significant differences in fruit yield as a result of the late season powdery mildew that developed in these experiments."" Here is another link that discusses the use of sulfur against PM (LT). http://utahpests.usu.edu/plantdiseases/files/uploads/PestMonitoring/tomato_powdery_mildew.pdf Ray, I would definately treat this early to try and stop its progression. Advanced cases are very hard to control no matter what you use. THis would be an opportunity to experiment with Serenade --using it preventatively on some of the plants that don't have it as it doesn't seem to be all that effective controlling existing disease. Sulfur , or whatever you choose on other plants. Then compare the results. Your plants are very close together so you will have to keep on your toes combatting this. Good luck.

Don't necessarily HAVE to have marble, but I really really like that aspect. I have found some at Room and Board and CB2 that I like, but they are SO short, only coming about 15 or 16 inches off the ground. I would prefer something closer to 20 as I use my coffee table as my laptop "desk" all the time. I found one that looks almost exactly like the one from the show except it is all wood made by Ole Wanscher, an MCM designer I had never heard of: I guess maybe I should concentrate more on finding something new that is reminiscent as it would be difficult to find exactly what I'm looking for in vintage. Any sources for round coffee tables with clean lines? I'd like something around 36-40" in diameter about 20" tall.

INDOOR AIR QUALITY TESTING BY POLLUTANT TYPE. https://www.heating-air-conditioning.org/ However, there are a few air pollutants that are very common among households. MOLD Mold in the house isn’t just a problem for people with allergy or asthma. It is every homeowner’s nightmare. Mold build-up can cause irreversible damage to your property as it can cause various surfaces such as wood, fabric, and even concrete to rot. Aside from the visible mold you cringe to see, mold also travels through the air and you may not notice it, like any other pollutants. Exposure to mold can cause a stuffy nose, throat irritation, coughing, and wheezing. Usually, if the mold is visible, there is no need to test it. Otherwise, you can submit an air sample to a laboratory to measure the concentration of mold spores in your home. You can also purchase indoor air quality testing mold kits to get the sample. Or, you can hire qualified mold professionals who will come to your home and conduct the test. This is an expensive approach but it provides a more accurate result. HOUSE DUST MITES You may not see them with your naked eyes but dust house mites are a real danger to you and your family. Put them under a microscope and you will surely scream! These tiny bugs can cause allergy symptoms like wheezing, coughing, runny nose, and itching. They could also cause skin irritation and trigger asthma. There are do it yourself indoor air quality testing kits for dust mite. Fortunately, these bugs are easier to address with the use of dehumidifiers or air conditioners (dust mites love warm environments). POLLEN During spring, summer, and fall, weeds, trees, and grasses release pollen into the air. Unfortunately, they easily attach themselves to anything, including people and pets and making easy entry to your house. Pollen can trigger a respiratory disease called hay fever. Indoor air quality testing can help determine the presence of two types of pollen allergens – the birch tree allergen and Timothy tree allergen. CHEMICAL POLLUTANTS (VOCS) Every household has a lot of chemical products at home, such as cleaners, paints, disinfectants, and stored fuels which can release contaminants in the air. Since VOCs are potentially toxic, testing for them is best done by trained technicians. The indoor air quality testing cost for chemicals ranges from $283 to $546, depending on the space and type of analysis nee

No drawers in it? Also search for console table. https://www.google.com/search?q=console+table+modern+glass&client=firefox-b-1-d&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwidv6Kz5cHwAhWXMlkFHbXUC0AQ_AUoAnoECAEQBA&biw=1420&bih=888