Planned Parenthood Will Soon Leave The Federal Family Planning Program

catkinZ8a

Planned Parenthood sets exit from federal family planning program

  • By Associated Press
  • Today
  • Updated 10:32 a.m

WASHINGTON >> Raising the stakes in an ideologically charged standoff over women’s health, Planned Parenthood said today it will soon leave the federal family planning program unless a court puts a hold on Trump administration rules that bar clinics from referring patients for abortions.


The administration responded that it is ready to operate the Title X family planning program without the organization that has been the largest provider. About 4 million women are served nationwide under the program, which distributes $260 million in grants to clinics. It’s unclear how many patients would be affected.


Planned Parenthood spokeswoman Erica Sackin said that its affiliated clinics “will be formally out of the Title X program” by Monday, passing up federal funding, unless the full 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco halts the new rules. The appeals court is weighing a lawsuit by Planned Parenthood and others to overturn the rules; a panel of judges in effect had earlier allowed the administration to go ahead with enforcement.


Monday also is the deadline set by the federal Department of Health and Human Services for participants in the family planning program to submit plans on how they would comply with the rules, which are set to take effect Sept. 18.


In a notice to the court today, Planned Parenthood said it “will be forced to withdraw” by close of business on Monday unless the full court intervenes. Planned Parenthood says the administration’s new policy is “unethical and dangerous,” amounting to a “gag rule” on clinicians.

In response, HHS spokeswoman Mia Heck said Planned Parenthood represents fewer than 400 of 4,000 service sites around the country.


“To the extent that Planned Parenthood claims that it must make burdensome changes to comply with the final rule, it is actually choosing to place a higher priority on the ability to refer for abortion instead of continuing to receive federal funds to provide a broad range of acceptable and effective family planning methods,” Heck said in a statement.


The immediate impact for patients remained unclear. Planned Parenthood says it serves about 40% of patients, but it has also pledged to keep its doors open as it contests the administration’s policy change. Other program participants unaffiliated with Planned Parenthood have warned they’d leave the program as well.


It seemed likely that disruptions to the 50-year-old program would vary from state to state. Some states have said they would step in to take over from the federal government. In addition to birth control, clinics provide basic health services and cancer screenings for many low-income women.


Although federal family planning money cannot be used to pay for abortions, clinics had been able to refer women seeking abortions to another provider. In many cases, that would be a Planned Parenthood facility.


The administration’s family planning rule is part of a series of efforts to remake government policy on reproductive health to please conservatives who are a key part of President Donald Trump’s political base. Religious conservatives see the program as providing an indirect subsidy to Planned Parenthood, which runs family planning clinics and is also a major abortion provider.


Along with the ban on abortion referrals by clinics, the rule’s requirements include financial separation from facilities that provide abortion, designating abortion counseling as optional instead of standard practice and limiting which staff members can discuss abortion with patients. Clinics would have until next March to separate their office space and examination rooms from the physical facilities of providers that offer abortions.


HHS says it does not want to see a disruption of services, and officials are willing to accommodate clinics that are making a “good-faith” effort to comply.


Abortion is a legal medical procedure, but federal laws prohibit the use of taxpayer dollars to pay for abortions except in cases of rape or incest or to save the life of the woman.


Planned Parenthood and other opponents of the administration’s rule say it would interfere with a medical professional’s duty to provide complete information to their patients. Also seeking to overturn the rule are several states and professional groups, including the American Medical Association.


“For all intents and purposes, (the new policy) imposes a gag rule on what information physicians can provide to their patients,” the AMA said in a statement this year. “The patient-physician relationship relies on trust, open conversation and informed decision making and the government should not be telling physicians what they can and cannot say to their patients.”


Anti-abortion groups are essentially daring Planned Parenthood to exit.


“Women across America are going to find out for themselves that they don’t need Planned Parenthood after the nation’s largest abortion vendor pulls out of a program that they never should have been in at all,” said Students for Life president Kristan Hawkins in a statement.

Comment





https://www.staradvertiser.com/2019/08/14/breaking-news/planned-parenthood-sets-exit-from-federal-family-planning-program/

SaveComment22Like
Comments (22)
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
Ann

Watching the 9th Circuit on this.

1 Like Save    
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
Ziemia(6a)

Hello more cases of STD.

Save    
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
Ziemia(6a)

Good old Mother Teresa - who created conditions like those found in Nazi Concentration Camps for the women she helped.

2 Likes Save    
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
elvis

What do you mean by that?

1 Like Save    
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
Ann

My question too:)

1 Like Save    
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
linaria_gw(zone 7 (about))

if you do some web search you will come across plenty of articles commenting on "most Holy MT" that she kept the subjects of her mercy in bad conditions, kind of on purpose (suffering is good for the soul or just good ol money pinching)


more than some fringe articles, so, yes definetely an issue, not so much blessing behind the scenes

1 Like Save    
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
catspa_zone9sunset14(aka)

Mother Theresa seems to have been big on redemption through suffering (ecstatic about it, apparently) and the way she ran her operation, suffering was never in short supply.

1 Like Save    
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
Ziemia(6a)

We have a quote here from Mother Teresa! You missed it?

Save    
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
Ziemia(6a)

Using Mother Teresa to rail against abortion is just another way to perpetuate the view that women are vessels.

Save    
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
catkinZ8a

MT may not be the saint we thought she was, stay tuned.

Save    
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
elvis

Ziemia, "vessel"?, as in:

a hollow container, especially one used to hold liquid, such as a bowl or cask.

synonyms:

container · receptacle · repository · holder · carrier · basin · bowl · dish · pan ·

[more]

pot · can · tin · jar · jug · pitcher · carafe · flask · decanter · urn · tub · bin · tank · drum · canister · butt · vat · cask · barrel · box · case · chest · casket · reservatory

  • (chiefly in or alluding to biblical use) a person, especially regarded as holding or embodying a particular quality.

    "Lord, use this lowly vessel, let me serve You as You will"

Save    
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
patriciae_gw(07)

The idea that a physician cant tell you about a legal medical procedure because the Federal Government says they cant should cause all sorts of alarm for conservative people who claim to believe in small government.

This is what this lunacy can lead to: the clinician cant refer you for a D&C or some similar procedure even though you are in the middle of an incomplete early miscarriage because that would be technically an abortion. Such scenarios are not uncommon. You will just have to suffer the consequences of your unexpelled uterine lining unless you can figure it out on your own. there is always the internet and a bunch of non expert advisors to tell you what to do.

4 Likes Save    
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
catkinZ8a

Get Gates, Steyer, Bezos, etc. to fund your Anti-Life Clinics.

Save    
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
catspa_zone9sunset14(aka)

An incomplete miscarriage happened to me, Patriciae, in my first pregnancy, and I ended up in the hospital for a D&C to remove the fetus -- an abortion. My physician for that belonged to a group that almost certainly received Title X money. Would he have been forbidden to refer me for the procedure? I might have bled to death or died of sepsis (real dangers), but who cares, right?

1 Like Save    
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
maifleur01

I keep wondering how many women will now have to die from incomplete miscarriages because the medical term for them are spontaneous abortions. Banning abortions will also ban these even though they can save the life of the woman. Some state laws that are currently before the courts ban any abortions. Some do have provisions for the life of the mother but not the health. While not from a miscarriage a friend recently developed sepsis and lived. Spent weeks in hospital and rehab centers so the idea of having to wait until a life is in danger for something that is medically necessary because of a law is very frightening.

1 Like Save    
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
Kathy

Especially when the men making these laws are actually clueless about a woman’s body. Politics is their bottom line.

Save    
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
catkinZ8a



Save    
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
catkinZ8a



1 Like Save    
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
maifleur01

Interesting since men including Trump offer to pay for and insist that women obtain abortions because men do not want to take precautions on their own.

Abortions are not always a decision of not wanting to have a child but wanting to live. Including living to take care of existing children.

Save    
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
ubro(2a)

breaking news: catkin, your last meme is a little off. If you do not allow abortions the governmentwill still be forcing men to be fathers. The only way they will not be forced to be fathers is thru abortion.

2 Likes Save    
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
catkinZ8a

Who's not allowing abortions?


Nice try.

Save    
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
elvis

Would he have been forbidden to refer me for the procedure?

I seriously doubt it.

Save    
Browse Gardening and Landscaping Stories on Houzz See all Stories
Life Is Open-Plan Living a Fad, or Here to Stay?
Architects, designers and Houzzers around the world have their say on this trend and predict how our homes might evolve
Full Story
Bathroom Workbook Convert Your Tub Space to a Shower — the Planning Phase
By JW
Step 1 in swapping your tub for a sleek new shower: Get all the remodel details down on paper
Full Story
Most Popular What to Look for in a House if You Plan to Age in Place
Look for details like these when designing or shopping for your forever home
Full Story