Impossible to say from a picture since tables of that style have been made in every decade.

In terms of value, the odds are it's not worth much. I had a fairly similar looking table with claw feet pedestal in "brown" wood finish - excellent condition and I just gave it away to a friend's brother who needed furniture.

It's hard to tell from a picture but it doesn't look all that old (40 years?) A lot of them were made in the 70s.

I would guess early 1980s with the value depends on whether the buyer really needed a dining table. At a garage sale, I would probably tag it at $75 and see if I got any takers

@linda - Why do you think the table is original?

I had one identical in style that I bought in 1982 which was identical to the one in the picture and made of solid oak and well manufactured. The place I bought the table from is now in business but now sells high quality Arts & Crafts style reproduction wood furniture because that is more currently fashionable in terms of vintage looking pieces.

The table has been in my family since before I was born ( 1969) given to me in 1993 when I refinished to top because it was getting gummy from cleaning it the wrong way. Probably with windex.

It 72 inches long with both leafs and 4 feet wide

The metal work has a stamp that I can hardley read maybe someone else can

The width of the boards in the top is what is indicitave of an older table.....and the mechanism to open it to accept the leaves also speaks to 1910-20.

.

The stamp looks like Walter & Co. and Wabash, IN

If you refinished the table, perhaps it is older. My big clue to age was the Phillip's screws for the hardware. Another helpful clue would be a picture of the attachment for the table top to the base. My hubby's table of that style was obviously reproduction because the interior pieces were softwood, and the oak was only visible surfaces.

When I was growing up in the 1940s, my mother had a table very much like this one: 2 center leaves, 4 curved legs, tended to be easily tipped over when the top was expanded.

That Phillips head screw and the wider boards put it squarely in the early 30's.

It is true that the Phillip's head screw was patented in the early 1930s; the screws were patented in 1932 and the screwdriver in 1933. However, like any new invention, they were limited in use at first and took many years to catch on widely. Phillip's head screws were not in common use for furniture making until well after WWII. I have several pieces of mid century furniture which were assembled with slot head screws.

That's a belt-sanded, small-board, glued-up production table. It has no collectible value and nothing that would be considered fine-woodworking. Just use it and enjoy it.

And you know this because?? Did you even read all of the OP's original statement?

Why the challenge lindac92? I expressed an opinion being 35 years in the business of fine woodworking and period restorations. You may choose to differ if you like.

In fairness to Keeping Room, OP merely stated that to his knowledge, the table had been bought prior to 1969.

There were plenty of mass produced wood furniture produced prior to 1969. Even brown wood furniture manufactured earlier than that, is not particularly valuable unless there is something unique in the design. Craigslist is filled with listings for furniture with no takers

Even if the table was manufactured in 1900, it would have little value because brown furniture of that style is not currently desirable and the market is flooded with it of all vintage. I had some very elaborate Victorian China cabinets with bowed glass which I know dated from the late 19th century and I could hardly give them away last year. If I had any room or way of using, I would have kept, but I found thema hime with my neighbor’s brother

It’s a functional table and if OP needs it and likes it, there is the value but realistically not much dollar market of one tries to sell it.

I believe those screw heads are cross-recess, not Phillips. The cross-recess slots are newer than Philips. The difference: The slots for Philips have generous amount of draft whereas the cross recess slots has very little draft. Sometimes, the toolmaker will add coining indents on the screw head top to reduce draft in the slots. Cross recess heads have less "cam out" action than a Philips when the proper bit is used.

The KEEPING ROOM

Why the challenge lindac92? I expressed an opinion being 35 years in the business of fine woodworking and period restorations. You may choose to differ if you like.

Hehe. I'm not lindac92, but if you read the OP's posts you'll see this table has been around longer than you've been in business, hence her challenge, perhaps?