You betcha, but not on this forum. Google "andy logan labs soil test" and you will find the Internet forum where about all they do is interpret Logan Labs soil tests for people like you (us!). Be sure to note where you live when you sign up (free). I'm just guessing but does your soil act like clay?

Pete, come see us at the lawn forum dot com. Bring your reel mower.

This one's interesting. What's your location and what type of grass do you have? The soil either shows severe over-liming or a naturally high-lime soil. The higher sodium level implies the latter, but... The grass type will determine the phosphorus setting. Most nothern lawns and some southern lawns require more fiddling here than a few southern ones do. The EC of nearly 15 says you have a good soil that holds lots of resources. Exactly what it is, you'd have to do a jar test. pH 8.0: Extremely high, but a lawn will still grow in this. Organic matter 3.55: In the good range, although I'd still try to push this much higher due to your high pH (and consequent very high calcium, Phosphorus 45: Short to extremely short due to the pH locking it up, but it's going to depend on your grass type. Let me know on that. Calcium 81%: High, but certainly not toxic or anything like that. We'll want to avoid lime and most calcium sources, however, simply because you don't need them. Magnesium 12%: Optimal. Again, we'll be avoiding sources of these to avoid pushing up your pH any further. Potassium 1.39%: Lower than I like (I prefer potassium levels of 3% or a little more for most lawns, and I go much higher in my own). Sodium 1.86%: Nudging a little high, but not a problem for grasses. This goes into the "keep an eye on" column and if it continues to head up we do something about it then. Most trace elements: Good to excellent, with no adjustments required. I'd be hesitant to adjust most of these with the pH that high and with two major nutrients requiring adjustment anyway. Iron 191: Very low for your pH, but not deficient. Lawns are likely to be a paler green than they would otherwise be. High pH binds up iron, and at that pH even chelated sources of iron simply won't work. Fortunately, using MIlorganite over time will work and add a lot of iron to the soil over time. Over the shorter term, you can spray iron (Bonide iron or 4 oz ferrous sulfate per thousand square feet) for color if you really want to. Current Recommendations: Now: Let me know your locale and grass type. September, as soon as you can: Apply any starter fertilizer at bag rate. Starter fertilizers have large middle numbers, like 20-27-5 or 18-24-5 or that range. Get the cheapest, the differences in that middle number aren't enough to matter and bag rate will target around 1 pound phosphorus per thousand square feet. September, one good rain or irrigation post the starter Locate potassium sulfate (most garden shops will order it for you, as will many landscapers, but this is not a common nutrient). Apply at 2 pounds per thousand square feet. Buy plenty, you're going to need it. I'll hold off on October recommendations until I know your locale and grass type; I don't want to risk ground freeze too early, nor overdoing things for your grass.

Logan Labs was picked by crowd sourcing. I believe morph was a part of that process where soil tests were sent to several labs to be checked, rechecked, and cross checked. Logan Labs and UMASS were distant winners in the test due to comprehensive testing at a low cost, proper testing procedures and chemistry, accuracy of results, test reliability, and retest repeatability. UMASS lost a close race due to inconsistent repeatability where they tested the same sample of soil and got marginally different answers. That's how I remember it. Can you add to that or clear things up Morph? The main problem with other labs is they don't provide a comprehensive test for all the micro nutrients, that Logan Labs and UMASS do for their most basic tests. If you want all the macros, micros, and organics tested at another lab, you'll have to pay for the basic plus micros plus organics. And then the cost goes up for several reasons and the repeatability goes down, because they're not doing their routine tests any more. They're doing something they haven't practiced a lot. Or it might be different people doing the test every time. Whatever, only two labs passed the high bar set by the lawn community.