POLL: Eco-friendly and sustainable design
Emily H
5 years ago
Low-flow (water-saving) plumbing fixtures
Energy-efficient appliances
LED lighting
Recycled/renewable materials
Toxin-free cabinet materials
Tankless water heater
Other - Tell us in the comments!
Featured Answer
Sort by:Oldest
Comments (123)
User
5 years agoBicycle Glass Co.
5 years agoRelated Discussions
Sustainable Landscape: height of trees and distance from house?
Comments (11)The results will be more appropriate to your site if you have the architect and landscape architect working together from the beginning, rather than wait to get the landscape designed. One versus two story design can both work with a house designed for passive solar gain in winter. I think the term "sustainable" design is entirely misunderstood by many. The broader concept of sustainability has to do with best use of resources for the desired use, and the most sustainable designs for housing would focus on rehabbing existing structures utilizing local recycled materials for best energy efficiencies. New construction is not really ever an example of sustainable design in the larger sense if it consumes more resources than rehabbing/upgrading existing older homes. I think instead you might prefer to define what you're interested in building as an energy efficient design for your climate that minimizes materials which require the most imbedded energy use to provide. Recycling materials from demolished construction and/or repurposing already manufactured materials in-lieu of newly made materials are examples of more sustainable design. Garden design sustainability would look at design for least energy inputs of off-site water and energy, minimizing the need for using power tools for maintenance, as well as on-site recycling of tree trimmings and garden debris. Planting choices and layout would emphasize plants that need the least pampering with added fertilizers and irrigation, placed to facilitate passive solar heating/cooling of the home, as well as a layout that minimizes the need for constant pruning to compensate for over-planting. Sustainability in the larger sense of the word is not really compatible with the classic idea of gardens; which nearly always require constant maintenance and inputs of labor, water, fertilizer,haul away of debris, weeding, etc to maintain the design concept. One may only come closer to being sustainable than actually truly sustainable with a garden, IMO. Therefore I find the buzz around being green and sustainable is often more hype and marketing to the wealthy than truly making our society more sustainable at large. I see this especially well illustrated at the high end residential home market with ridiculously large yet energy efficient homes built with expensive materials and systems that can't begin to scale for mass production or lower income homes, and represent silly claims of sustainability that can't logically be supported. If you really are interested in minimizing your energy footprint, keep the new home sized small, emphasize re-use and repurposing of materials, and look at overall imbedded energy costs of material choices for the home and garden, and try to maximize local energy efficient materials. Design choices will always have to balance tradeoffs between initial costs and energy savings over time. I bet there are local builders, architects and landscape designers who are exploring how these ideas play out in your local climate. I'd also advise that there's a lot of hype over cost effective performance, and it will come down to your personal choices and preferences as to how "sustainable" you choose to be. In my own case, I chose to remodel my existing home of relatively modest square footage, replacing all existing windows, electrical and plumbing, adding additional insulation throughout as well as adding a more energy efficient radiant floor heating system along with new skylights for better day time lighting, rather than looking to build a new home from scratch. If I'd had the money, I'd have liked to add solar panels to the roof, but couldn't justify the additional upfront costs. I've made the house less expensive to heat in winter and use less water and power on a monthly basis, but don't make claims that the process was sustainable to the degree of recycling of all removed materials and only using recycled building products. I do think it is more sustainable staying in an older existing dense urban neighborhood already built out and well connected to utility and transit grids rather than moving to the exurbs.I've managed to keep my commuting to jobs within a 15 to 30 mile drive, at the same time I've improved the comfort and lifespan of an exsisting home built with old growth redwood, as well as reorganize the interior space for better living without enlarging the footprint. Those are the sort of concepts I believe are more realistically sustainable as compared to brand new construction....See MoreWhy I vow to never support the Peat industry for my entire life.
Comments (107)The average person looking at a wing cross-section would think it pushed down, not lifts up. Common sense would fail them there. And not wanting to be disagreeable, but I think common experience (emperical results), not common sense, guides most good gardening. We often don't know specifically why something works, at least in any rigorous sense, but we know what has worked reliably for others and ourselves. Reasonable, common sense solutions can sometimes lead us astray. Common sense might easily have all our pear pruning in the dormant season (as with most other deciduous fruits): practical experience shows that some summer pruning is often more effective. Common sense had us removing lawn clippings from the lawn ("leads to thatch buildup"): actualy experience (experiment) shows that leaving them is best apparently and has nothing to do with thatch. It is often hard to figure out when to defer to authority (whether university or neighbor) and when to go with the gut, with common sense. Fortunately in gardening, experimenting and failing occasionally has little risk....See MoreSpring systems and arhaus, crate&barrel, z gallerie sectional
Comments (4)Both Sir John and Freethinker99 have given excellent analyses on the various options available. On the other hand consumers must constantly balance questions of quality vs. cost. There is no doubt that 8 way hand tied coils and 5/4" solid wood frames are superior to drop-in coils (or no-sag) springs and plywood frames. On the other hand a well-built plywood frame sofa with an inexpensive no-sag spring system, costing many hundreds of dollars less, can still be expected to last at least 10 years. Cushions and fabric are far more likely to wear out long before the frame and springs. On sofas retailing for under $1500 by far the most popular type of cushion construction is a 1.8 density HR (High Resilience) polyurethane foam with a polyester fiber wrapping. This type of cushion construction will typically hold up for only 3-5 years before beginning to lose its shape and resilience. If you are looking for a sofa to hold up for 10 years you will need to upgrade your cushions. The two most popular upgrade options include spring-down or high density foam cushions. Spring-down cushions are constructed using a coil spring system inside which is surrounded by foam and typically topped with a down/feather/fiber blend. Another popular cushion upgrade option is one using a high density foam. The higher the cushion density, the more foam is used per cubic inch and the greater the cushion durability. Although a 2.0 density HR (High Resilience) foam is a definite improvement over the standard 1.8 density, I would recommend a 2.2 density or higher if you want your cushions to last 10 years. Fabric durability is the other primary concern for a sofa lasting 10 years. Although there are literally hundreds of variations that can affect a specific fabric's durability, in general look for thicker, heavier fabrics that are tightly woven. Keep in mind that a fabric's cleanability may also be a factor as a "dirty" or badly stained couch is unappetizing no matter how long you have owned it....See MoreSeeking feedback on Comfort Design sectionals
Comments (2)I have not personally specified Comfort Design for my clients before. However with a $5000 budget I would recommend you also consider Medley Home, ABC Home or at the lower end of price points, Room and Board. These brands are well known, make durable furniture suitable for both residential and commercial applications, have good customer service, warranties, etc. Medley Home is my personal favorite as they offer healthy and eco friendly foam and upholstery options, sustainably sourced wood for frames, are made in California, and do not use flame retardant chemicals (which are damaging to our health but used by many manufacturers). Good luck with your search!...See MoreDiana Bier Interiors, LLC
5 years agoUser
5 years agoDiana Bier Interiors, LLC
5 years agocarol beachlady
5 years agoUser
5 years agoFinal Seal Pros
5 years agoDiana Bier Interiors, LLC
5 years agolast modified: 5 years agoUser
5 years agolast modified: 5 years agoilovebungalows
5 years agoDiana Bier Interiors, LLC
5 years agoDiana Bier Interiors, LLC
5 years agoUser
5 years agolast modified: 5 years agoilovebungalows
5 years agoshea42
5 years agoSheila Smith
5 years agoilovebungalows
5 years agoSean Rice
5 years agoUser
5 years agolast modified: 5 years agoLizzy L.
5 years agoToronto Veterinarian
5 years agoDiana Bier Interiors, LLC
5 years agoToronto Veterinarian
5 years agolast modified: 5 years agoUser
5 years agolast modified: 5 years agoWm. C. Wmson
5 years agohavingfun
5 years agoSunny
5 years agofelizlady
5 years agoUser
5 years agolast modified: 5 years agoTBL from CT
5 years agocoppertops
5 years agoAmber Webb
5 years agoJanis Doucette
5 years agoUser
5 years agoBadass Chick Extraordinaire
5 years agoDiane Chen
5 years agoWacheke Eco Fold Studios
5 years agopoppiepink
5 years agol pinkmountain
5 years agoUser
5 years agol pinkmountain
5 years agoilovetoswim
4 years agoPaul F.
4 years agoAmber Webb
4 years agoUser
4 years agoHU-984309471
4 years agoPaul F.
4 years agoValerie H
4 years agolhultgren
4 years ago
Related Stories
HOUZZ TV LIVETour 2 Stylish, Eco-Minded Rooms in an Interior Designer’s Home
In this video, San Francisco designer Jennifer Jones shares sustainable choices she made in her living and dining rooms
Full StoryGREEN BUILDING6 Efficient, Eco-Friendly Projects
Get ideas for a more sustainable design from the tiniest of houses to an entire community
Full StoryKITCHEN DESIGNKitchen of the Week: A Warm and Eco-Friendly Update
A Seattle Couple Remodels Their 1920s Kitchen With Reclaimed and Salvaged Materials
Full StoryKITCHEN DESIGNEco-Friendly Materials: Kitchen Countertops
Going green in the kitchen opens the door to unusual countertop materials that are beautiful, durable and kind to the planet
Full StoryHOMES AROUND THE WORLD3 Stunning Indian Homes With Eco-Friendly Elements
These houses incorporate energy-efficient techniques and locally sourced materials for better sustainability
Full StoryEARTH DAY12 Sustainable Gardening Ideas From Landscape Design Pros
Create a more earth-friendly garden by planting for pollinators, ditching pesticide use and more
Full StoryHOUZZ TVSee an Eco-Friendly Backyard Cottage in 700 Square Feet
In this video, watch how a green builder helps a Seattle couple create an energy-efficient home inspired by Houzz photos
Full StoryREMODELING GUIDES10 Great Picks for Eco-Friendly Tile
Go a little greener with beautiful tiles created with reclaimed and recycled materials
Full StoryGARDENING AND LANDSCAPINGGuest Picks: 20 Eco-Friendly Playhouses
Fun and recyclable children's forts for indoor and outdoor play
Full StorySMALL HOMESHouzz Tour: A Tiny, Happy, Eco-Friendly Home
Think your house is small? Try finding all the space you need in 120 square feet
Full Story
queenvictorian