I am looking for the same info! I was considering range tops until I saw this, and my heart skipped a beat! Did you end up buying it? Would love your review!

“does anyone, know if you can install a wall oven under the Wolf cooktop?” @susanrhill34 - there are issues with installing a wall oven under a cooktop. First, there is a clearance issue. You must make certain to abide by the clearance specified for below the cooktop, and the clearance specified for above the wall oven. There often is not enough room for both, so you’d have to find another combination of cooktop and wall oven where there would be enough clearance for both. Second, the wall oven installed under a cooktop will be so low to the ground that when the oven door is open, it is nearly touching the ground, and that low height is awkward and cumbersome for taking things out of the oven that are boiling hot, heavy, and/or sloshing. Third, you would be better served with buying a range. A range would cost thousands less than a cooktop with wall oven underneath including the challenges of installing them.

This particular model has two levels of "flush". The "two-cut" approach does make the edges completely flush with the countertop, but as pointed out, requires extra fabrication. However there is another option which leaves just the thin stainless lip on top of the counter. In that configuration it drops in to the standard 36" cooktop cutout that works with most brands. It's not completely flush but very nearly so, and as such, is *way* lower that most cooktops or rangetops. Do note that you'll need to drill through the front of the cabinet for the knobs and although their height is somewhat adjustable you'll want to make sure that will work for your installation. Personally I agree with the op, the clean lines of this particular cooktop look way better to be than the more common look of both cooktops and rangetops. In addition to the flat lines. I especially like that the knobs are not on the upper surface. It seems more custom and similar to a rangetop and allows more space on the top surface as well as a better (IMO) appearance.

Aside from pacemakers, other medical devices like insulin pumps can be affected by induction hobs. https://jdrf.org.uk/news/induction-hob-magnetic-field-danger-insulin-pump/ “cpartist What if one of the cooks has a pacemaker or ICD? That's not a problem with the majority of today's pacemakers and in reality, when batteries are replaced nowadays they're replaced with ones that can even go through an MRI machine. Not an issue.” Where are you getting this information??? MRIs are an issue even with an MRI ready pacemaker. You are not just replacing batteries, but the whole pacing system called a generator. You will get newer technology but in order to utilize a MRI ready pacemaker you need the right leads(the wires that go to the heart from the pacemaker). Leads are not usually changed unless there is a specific reason to do that so not that many MRI ready pacemakers are in place. Some MRIs are done now on people with conventional pacemakers but it is still considered a contraindication most of the time especially if you are pacemaker dependent. As technology improves and more whole systems are placed the amount of MRI ready pacemakers will increase. This from Mayo Clinic discusses this issue and MRIs with a conventional pacemaker. https://www.mayoclinic.org/medical-professionals/cardiovascular-diseases/news/new-protocols-allow-for-mri-in-selected-pacemaker-patients/mac-20430571 The limitations from the article. “The first MRI-conditional pacemaker received FDA approval for use in the United States in February 2011. This first-generation device has important limitations: It requires a special lead system, so the generator cannot be simply replaced and connected to in situ intracardiac leads. Cardiac MRI is excluded because of potential overheating of the new lead system (second-generation devices currently available in Europe use a lead system that is compatible with cardiac MRI). Additionally, the first-generation devices are limited to 1.5-tesla scanners.” Back to induction hob safety, this is kind of a rehash of what I wrote above but not everyone reads the whole thread. There are more considerations than calling up the pacemaker company. I would also talk to the cardiologist/electrophysiologist that put it in. Consider what happens to the pacemaker if it is affected by an induction hob. Is the person dependent on the pacemaker? Do they have an underlying heart rate that is compatible with life if the pacemaker fails? “Safe” distance from the hob also can vary up to 24” away. As with most things, you would consider risk vs benefit for using induction but it is important to be informed. I would also talk to your primary health care provider to determine if you have any other ancillary devices that might be affected. For me, with many years in the medical field (critical care and surgery), I have found that things don’t always go the way they are supposed to. I probably have a skewed viewpoint because I see the worst things that can happen but my husband had a defective pacemaker. Something in the programming changed. It did not show up for a year. Was it damaged from exposure to some sort of magnetic field along the way? The manufacturer looked at it but did not come to any conclusions that they shared with us.