SHOP PRODUCTS
Houzz Logo Print
missindie1

Tiling a "backsplash" on a non-working kitchen wall. Yay or nay?

7 years ago
last modified: 7 years ago

So we tiled the backsplash area on my "working" kitchen wall last weekend. No grout yet but I love the way it looks. I had planned to also tile the opposite side, even thought that side is not a working side. But now I am wondering if that's a silly thing to do. No food prep takes place there other than the microwave. There is the fridge, and the built-in desk/computer area.

This is the part that I really work in, and that is the new backsplash. (Excuse the mess - I am still working on getting the tile ready for grout.)


The opposite wall:

I had painted before the counters were in, just to not look at the bare wall, so that wall has some paint, but it is by no means complete. Either I decide to just go with the paint, (which is the same as the far end kitchen wall and the dining room), or I tile to match the opposing wall. By the way, that little quartz splash on the side was done because the fabricator insisted - I really didn't think it was needed. In any event, if I tiled, it would be on the back wall only, so you really could not even see it behind the MW.

What would you do? Somehow I assumed that this would be the "normal" thing to do, but now I am wondering why I thought that. Tile is already bought, but I can take it back so that isn't an issue.

Comments (20)