Tying to decide on yellow rose
junco1102
6 years ago
Featured Answer
Sort by:Oldest
Comments (44)
Vaporvac Z6-OhioRiverValley
6 years agolast modified: 6 years agojunco1102 thanked Vaporvac Z6-OhioRiverValleyMoses, Pittsburgh, W. PA., zone 5/6, USA
6 years agolast modified: 6 years agojunco1102 thanked Moses, Pittsburgh, W. PA., zone 5/6, USARelated Discussions
please help me decide, adding fourth rose to order
Comments (5)growing2010, Spice, Enchantress and Cels Multiflora are teas that will stay under 5 feet, and I have all three of them. Enchantress has been the slowest to take off but has beautifully colored purplish red flowers. Cels Multiflora blooms all the time, and they are darling light pink blooms. I have two plants of Spice, with a very fragrant, spicy scent, and it can tolerate shade. I would definitely get at least one of these three, probably Cels Multiflora would be my first recommendation. Ingrid...See MorePlease help me decide on a yellow climbing rose.
Comments (12)thanks all, I didn't even think of cl. "Lady Hillingdon" and I do want the bush form of Lady Hillingdon, but for the house would prefer a more lemony hue to go against the pale gray house. I just added "Lamarque" to my order from rogue valley, yesterday, I'm getting two "Westside Road Cream Tea" rosebushes to flank the front of the pathway to my front door, they will be side by side with "Mlle. Cecille Brunner"( the smaller c. 4' tall form) with an arbor in back of these with yellow climbing roses "Marachel NIel" and "Cecline Foreestier" and French lavender on the other side of the arbor so the view from my front door will be of lavender, yellow climbers, and "Mme. Berkeley" and "Clementina Carboinieri" off to one side, where I'm planting a mandarin orange tree for evergreen winter interest. The yellow climber I'm searching for will be on this side of the house. Originally I planned for cl. "Cramoisi Superieur" but decided I love yellow roses more than red roses. I still can't decide although I'm leaning towards "Alistair Stella Gray"which I've grown before, or "Leys Perpetual" although I swore I'd never again buy a rose that I have never seen in "person". so many beautiful roses, and finite rose real estate. Lux....See MoreWas The Rose 'Ty' Actually Miniature Queen?
Comments (4)Suzanne / Rosetech, Thank you both for posting. I agree with both of you rose testers that Ty is a miniature rose, that was preciously the purpose of the post on the GW site on July 13,2005, making other judges and exhibitors aware of Ty’s new reclassification. It seems everyone who was a test grower for the rose was aware of the status change of Ty, but the general public and all judges at the show, including the show chairman of judges. Judges were not informed that Ty was recently reclassified as a miniature rose, and disqualified was based on the latest dated information ARS published. After Ty was verified as a miniature, my ballot was the first to be submitted to show chairman voting for Ty as miniature queen. Talking to Robbie that afternoon, asked him about the change on Ty’s classification. As Suzanne stated, on advice from test growers he made the change submitting it to ARS in June. On July 11,2005 two days after the rose show, I sent the following e-mail to the ARS National Chairman of Registrations: Phil, Let me again repeat what was stated previously. As long as ARS uses an antiquated method of reporting on roses in the Rose, or ARS/IRAR web site, is not serving its purpose of providing the latest information to judges and exhibitors. As a matter of fact at the present time, no ARS publications regarding rosés have up to date information in them. Even the ARS/ IRAR web site is making it very inconvenient for judges or exhibitors to correctly identify roses, and may or may not be listing roses correctly. You have to ask why ARS makes changes corrections/ additions/ deletions to the AEN or ARS / IRAR web site, without properly notifying the public? Let me explain why. This weekend at the Seventh National Miniature Rose Show in Indianapolis, Robbie Tucker won Miniature Queen of the show with “Ty”. But not before a short discussion on the roses true classification. The April Rose magazine lists it as a mini-flora, but no correction was noted in the July Rose magazine. ARS still lists it as a mini-flora on its web site judge’s page as of July 7, 2005 (that list was also to include, corrections/ additions/ deletions). According to the ARS / IRAR web site it was originally registered on 3-3-05 as a mini-flora. Based on this and all other official ARS publications having identical information, “Ty” should have been classified as a mini-flora. Luckily the hybridizer was there and said he had reclassified it to a miniature over a month ago. Arriving home today, looked over a listing of approximately 623 registered roses, or 25 pages of ARS / IRAR web site listing over the years, found it is now registered as a miniature rose also on 3-3-05. ARS has two options to correctly this confusing situation with roses posted on the ARS / IRAR web site. Insist on the day of a show, the show chairman download the entire 25 pages of registered roses beginning April 2001, and have this current list available for judges. Or use common sense and post any change to a previously registered rose on the date the change was made, thereby bringing it to the everyone’s attention, as newly registered roses are. (In previous e-mail to the registration chairman about providing more timely data on roses, was told corrections / additions/ deletions are entered when the Registration Committee has time). While it is true the ARS / IRAR web site can be considered a quicker means of proving the latest information on roses. It will only happen when it is properly managed with timely reports on roses. If they’re other roses typical to “Ty”, they should be brought to the public’s attention quickly. (As of the original post there was no highlighting of a rose having a change) Ty can be considered one of the best yellow (dy) miniatures to date, clear color with slightly larger mini-flora foliage. Without doubt a Queen, classed as a miniature or mini-flora rose. Ron S July 11, 2005 Rosetech, while I do sort roses by date, it only show roses by the latest date of roses registered, but if a change is made you have to go thru the entire 625 registered (at the time of this particular incident) to find a change of a roses status. Than it dose not indicate what the change was and when it was made, this is where the problem lies. Preciously what I am trying to get ARS to address, that any change in the publication be brought to the viewer’s attention. Like Ty registered as both a miniature and mini-flora on the same date. Believe me I have been trying hard to work with ARS, keeping judges and exhibitors up to date on roses, with publishing “Rose Lists” each month on the GW site, as well as many, many, many rose people belonging to the “Rose Group” that receive these lists by e-mail. Both Phil Schorr and Marily Young are on the e-mail list. In fact brought 30 of the latest copies of both to the national rose show, that was distributed so judges would be working with the latest ARS information. Making several suggestions to the Registration Chairman about several changes they could make to alleviate the problem by making changes stands out. Now besides being highlighted; add a second line noting change and date it was made. Received the following e-mail from Phil: “I checked with Marily Young concerning the possibility of adding a second line with update information to RR website listing. She said it would require some programming work, for which she doesn’t have time currently. We understand your suggestion and the benefits it may have, but we have to prioritize our work for ARS, which already takes up many hours per week, and making a program change like this doesn’t rank very high on the list right now when we are beginning work on the next Modern Roses along with our duties on registration, RIR, and other ARS publications. I hope we can revisit it someday, since it is a good idea. Phil” First let me say this is not something for me personally, it is necessary and for all ARS members. Being that both Phil and Marily are up to their necks in work, and have any time to address the problem at this time. Would it be asking too much, that until they have time to revisit it, they would they let me know of corrections / additions/ deletions to ARS publications that could easily be included on monthly posted “Rose Lists”. If something is working extremely well since the 2001, why would ARS not take advantage of the situation is beyond comprehension. The Combined Rose List is a non-ARS publication, yet a majority of the handbook and the AEN use it extensively. Back to the question asked in the original post? (Test growers receiving inside information from the hybridizer on the rose Ty, are not included) Not knowing a change of classification was indicated in any ARS publications at the time Ty was judged, as a judge how would you have judged it as a miniature or mini-flora rose? From e-mail received,nine judges indicated as mini-flora and one judge as a miniature, saying judges should have checked all RR listing on the web site. I have to wonder what the judge would be looking for in the RR listing, being there is no indication (at that time), on any of the 625 roses listed that something was changed, or when a change took place. You have to ask, in the future is a judge going have to check each rose judged. As ridicules as this sound, it may end up that way unless ARS takes time to make necessary adjustments. Ron Schwerdt...See MoreMy Ty rose...
Comments (2)Glad to hear you are having success with your Ty rose. Dare I ask what is in your "John's Juice"? It sounds like your rose likes it....See MoreVaporvac Z6-OhioRiverValley
6 years agolast modified: 6 years agojunco1102 thanked Vaporvac Z6-OhioRiverValleyjim1961 / Central Pennsylvania / Zone 6
6 years agolast modified: 6 years agojunco1102 thanked jim1961 / Central Pennsylvania / Zone 6junco1102
6 years agojunco1102
6 years agogardenshine
6 years agosabalmatt_tejas
6 years agorosecanadian
6 years agoVaporvac Z6-OhioRiverValley
6 years agoReb Z6-KS
5 months agorosecanadian
5 months agoAaron Rosarian Zone 5b
4 months agorosecanadian
4 months agoJadae
4 months agoAaron Rosarian Zone 5b
4 months agorosecanadian
4 months agoKristine LeGault 8a pnw
4 months agoseasiderooftop
4 months agoKristine LeGault 8a pnw
4 months agorosecanadian
4 months agoKristine LeGault 8a pnw
4 months agorosecanadian
4 months agoPatrick-7a-MD
4 months agoDiane Brakefield
4 months agorosecanadian
4 months agoKristine LeGault 8a pnw
4 months agoJadae
4 months agoFeiy (PNWZ8b/9a)
4 months agoJadae
4 months agoFeiy (PNWZ8b/9a)
4 months agolast modified: 3 months agoKittyNYz6
3 months agolast modified: 3 months ago
Related Stories
YELLOWBrighten Up With Lemon Yellow
Get Inspired to Add a Little Sun to Your Springtime Decor
Full StoryWINTER GARDENINGPruning Secrets for Exquisite Roses
Encourage gorgeous blooms year after year with this time-tested advice on how to prune your rosebush in winter for health and shape
Full StoryGARDENING GUIDESWhat Kind of Roses Should You Grow?
Want to add the beauty of roses to your garden? Find out which ones, from old-fashioned to modern, are right for you
Full StoryCOLORTricky Yellow — Friend or Foe?
It might rev you up or wear you down. Learn what the experts have to say about using this complex color at home
Full StoryCOLORBest Ways to Use the Soft Yellow Color of 2014
You may fall for PPG Pittsburgh Paints’ Turning Oakleaf if you like your hues warm, mellow and cheery
Full StoryFLOWERS15 Yellow Flowers That Will Help Your Garden Glow
Your garden will look sunnier this spring and summer with one of these yellow-blossoming plants
Full StoryCOLORBathed in Color: Favorite Yellows and Golds for the Bath
Get a golden glow for your bathroom with these expert paint picks and ideas for yellow walls
Full StoryGARDENING GUIDES5 Sweet to Spirited Pink Roses for an Enchanting Garden
Whether you go demure or daring, there's a pink rose here to make you flush with garden pride
Full Story
Diane Brakefield