Ventilation Hood Advice: Vent-A-Hood or Miele Insert Liner
7 years ago
Featured Answer
Sort by:Oldest
Comments (26)
- 7 years ago
Related Discussions
Help for the right height and hood insert/vent system in new kitchen
Comments (13)opaone opined. I think there is a fairly direct relationship between the baffle area, CFM's and noise. More CFMs for a given set of baffles (and constant baffle area) will increase baffle turbulence noise. However, baffle noise (generally a hiss sound) is not dominant unless a silencer is used with a remote blower. Otherwise, blower blade turbulence noise can be expected to dominate at the flow rates needed when cooking with hot pans (grease or oil near the smoke point). The larger the baffles the less the noise for any given CFM. I assume though that likewise the larger the baffle/CFM the less grease is removed? Two things are happening here. First, if the flow velocity near the baffles is not high enough, rising effluent will reflect from baffle surfaces and potentially escape from the hood aperture. Second, if the velocity in the baffles is not high enough, grease particles from the larger end of the particle spectrum will not be collected as well as they should be, causing them to pass into the ducting where they may condense on the duct surfaces. @Kaseki, do you know if there are any guidelines for baffle design/size/CFM for proper residue removal? Certainly those in the business of designing hoods and baffles will have design rules they use. I haven't come across any specific baffle design guidelines, but hood guidelines for use of particular baffles exist for those sources that produce baffles for commercial uses. Below are links to two example baffle (systems) with their pressure characteristics. (Links may need to be copied and inserted into one's browser.) http://productadmin.componenthardware.com/pdfRepository/repositoryFiles/20120906_025437_type%20i_product%20info_11-2011.pdf http://productadmin.componenthardware.com/pdfRepository/repositoryFiles/20120906_025211_type%20ii_product%20info_11-2011.pdf Baffles are going to be relatively simple on residential baffle arrays, and may have been experimentally tested and revised before production to yield decent effectiveness at minimal production cost. Are there trade-offs to that 90 CFM per sq ft aperture? EG, what happens if it's only 75 CFM? My simplifications are intended to avoid the extreme complexity of a problem space that can best be analyzed by computational fluid dynamics (CFD). What we have is a plume extent that has a shape, and associated with that shape is a velocity profile. The velocity changes with height and angle. When this plume enters the flow field close to the baffles, a lot of possible flow effects can happen, depending on the plume momentum and baffle details. There are also the tapered sides of the hood to consider as well as flat surfaces around the baffles. Picking the worst case plume velocity (~1.2 m/s) and demanding it be met by the baffle air velocity at the baffle gaps, and treating the plume shape (relatively bi-variate Gaussian) as a 10-degree constant velocity expanding cone for capture analysis seem to be adequate assumptions to avoid having readers later whine that their hoods were inadequate. 90 ft/min averaged over the aperture is just one of those approximations where the reality is that cooler cooking will require less, hence induction will require less than gas cooking due to lack of entrained hot gas combustion products in the plume, and in some cases will require more, except that the hood typically extends beyond some parts of any given plume thereby aiding containment of some momentum-degraded sideways drifting effluent near the baffles. Further, the overall air flow has some small capture influence beyond the edges of the hood entrance aperture, particularly for the lower velocity portions of the higher angle plume portions, and the overall flow over the cooking surface tends to move air toward the hood which also has some influence farther down for low velocity effluent. So, for many cases 75 CFM/sq.ft. may be adequate. Below is a copy of a table providing recommended updraft velocities for different cooking devices taken from one of the most useful of on-line sources, the Greenheck guide available at: http://www.greenheck.com/media/pdf/otherinfo/KVSApplDesign_catalog.pdf Note that this is for a 4-ft x 9-ft commercial hood probably 7 ft above the floor. Also note that there are various factors involved in using these numbers that may be found in the accompanying text. And of particular interest to me is that "wok" is listed with the "extra-heavy" category. This is probably applicable to Asian restaurant wok burners providing 100k - 200k BTU/hr gas jets. For residential wok cooking, the plume effects from the burner will be much less, but the temperature at the wok surface may be similar -- meaning that some parts of the plume velocities may be similar. So where should a residential wok be located in the table? I have induction for both cooktop and wok hob, and roughly 90 CFM/sq. ft. maximum air flow rate into my Wolf Pro Island hood, mounted at 34-inches over a peninsula, and it does a pretty good capture and containment job. Wall mount instead of island mount, gentle cooking instead of grilling or wokking, induction instead of gas, and other factors such as no cross drafts or an oversized hood may allow lower specific flow rates to be adequate relative to the table or others' experiences. Further, the reality is that for the most affordable MUA schemes, the inherent pressure loss will degrade the hood flow rate beyond that due to just duct and baffle pressure losses. So the renovator's task when contemplating 90 CFM/sq.ft. is to divine the degree to which my conservatism is overkill in the context of the entire ventilation system, kitchen layout, and cooking style, and design accordingly. kas...See MoreRange hood liners, inserts, blowers, oh my!
Comments (23)The wrapping will help with vibration carried down the duct sheet metal, but not so much with acoustic noise carried down the air path. The silencer has to be larger than the duct for the same reason that a car muffler has to be larger than its exhaust and tail pipes. The acoustic waves have to be partially delayed to mix with out-of-phase waves to cancel some of the sound, without adding significant pressure loss. An alternative to the silencer for reducing blade tip turbulence is to operate the blower at a lower speed. For the same flow rate, this requires a blower that is larger in diameter than the usual manufacturer matches to desired flow rates. (Compare and or contrast a Casablanca type ceiling fan -- many CFM with no noise.) For kitchen ventilation, I would look into a commercial up-blast blower. These often have a belt drive between the fan part and the motor, and the belt sheave ratios can be changed for various purposes. So a, say, 2200 CFM rated blower operated with a sheaf ratio such that at full power the flow rate is actually only 1200 CFM, or whatever you need, should be considerably quieter than say a Broan 1200 CFM unit operated at full power. There are many up-blast blowers available from commercial ventilation distributors, but determining what you need may be difficult. It would be for me without getting the necessary literature. You may find a source such as Greenheck to be willing to provide some advice over the telephone or someone at a local commercial HVAC outfit. It is also possible (I've never looked into this) that Fantech could provide some low speed in-line blowers that together moved enough air and could be set to be lower in speed. This might be asked of their engineering support via telephone. But I would be surprised if they could do so without exceeding your duct diameter and still interface to the duct without pressure loss issues. Anyway, usually roof installations are easier to access than duct installations when the duct is nestled in the joist space and covered by gypsum....See MoreMiele ventilation - Built-in and insert ventilation
Comments (2)I see no reason to have to go with Miele venting system and unless your kitchen is vet ry traditional I would stay with a simple stinless hood and no wood surround that gets greasy and ugly very often...See MoreHood Liner insert recommendations? Looking at Zephyr Monsoon DCBL
Comments (9)@TxMomma really appreciate the insight. I will have a 36” wide Wolf range, so I need the 42” wide vent insert and that one has the 1200 CFM capability. But I doubt I’ll ever need to use it on that setting and my contractor assured me that my space is large enough with sufficient ventilation so that makeup air wouldn’t be an issue for me. I also found vent-a-hood much more expensive and my appliance person highly recommended the Zephyr brand and the Monsoon II in particular because of its depth and also the LED lighting in the front and back of the insert. Sounds like such a nice practical feature. Would love to hear how it sounds/works once you have the chance to test it out. Thanks...See MoreRelated Professionals
Albany Kitchen & Bathroom Designers · College Park Kitchen & Bathroom Designers · Commerce City Kitchen & Bathroom Designers · Gainesville Kitchen & Bathroom Designers · Knoxville Kitchen & Bathroom Designers · North Versailles Kitchen & Bathroom Designers · Oneida Kitchen & Bathroom Designers · Sunrise Manor Kitchen & Bathroom Remodelers · Overland Park Kitchen & Bathroom Remodelers · Port Arthur Kitchen & Bathroom Remodelers · Turlock Kitchen & Bathroom Remodelers · Billings Cabinets & Cabinetry · Red Bank Cabinets & Cabinetry · Ridgefield Cabinets & Cabinetry · Miller Place Plumbers- 7 years agolast modified: 7 years ago
- 7 years ago
- 7 years ago
- 7 years ago
- 6 years ago
- 6 years ago
- 6 years ago
- 6 years ago
- 5 years ago
- 5 years ago
- 5 years ago
- 5 years ago
- 5 years ago
- 5 years ago
- 5 years ago
- 5 years ago
- 5 years ago
- 5 years ago
- 5 years ago
- 5 years ago
- 5 years agolast modified: 5 years ago
Related Stories

KITCHEN DESIGNHow to Choose the Right Hood Fan for Your Kitchen
Keep your kitchen clean and your home's air fresh by understanding all the options for ventilating via a hood fan
Full Story
KITCHEN APPLIANCESThe Many Ways to Get Creative With Kitchen Hoods
Distinctive hood designs — in reclaimed barn wood, zinc, copper and more — are transforming the look of kitchens
Full Story
KITCHEN APPLIANCESDisappearing Range Hoods: A New Trend?
Concealed exhaust fans cut visual clutter in the kitchen
Full Story
KITCHEN DESIGNHow to Get Your Range Hood Right
Get a handle on the technical specs, and then learn about fun design options for creating a beautiful kitchen feature
Full Story
KITCHEN APPLIANCESWhat to Consider When Adding a Range Hood
Get to know the types, styles and why you may want to skip a hood altogether
Full Story
KITCHEN APPLIANCESHouzz Call: Show Us Your Creative Range Hood
Have you customized your kitchen’s range hood? Please tell us all about it
Full Story
KITCHEN DESIGNWood Range Hoods Naturally Fit Kitchen Style
Bring warmth and beauty into the heart of your home with a range hood crafted from nature's bounty
Full Story
KITCHEN DESIGN10 Terrific New Ideas for Wrapped Range Hoods
See how designers use various materials and ornamentation to play up or play down a covered kitchen range hood
Full Story
KITCHEN DESIGNA Cook’s 6 Tips for Buying Kitchen Appliances
An avid home chef answers tricky questions about choosing the right oven, stovetop, vent hood and more
Full Story
KITCHEN APPLIANCESLove to Cook? You Need a Fan. Find the Right Kind for You
Don't send budget dollars up in smoke when you need new kitchen ventilation. Here are 9 top types to consider
Full Story
homepro01