I-Cool for Menopause Class Action Lawsuit

8 years ago

Did i-Cool for Menopause not work for
you? Did it fail to relieve you of your hot flashes and night sweats?

If so, you might be entitled to a refund.
As part of a class action settlement, you can submit a claim for your
refund here: http://i-coolclassaction.com/claim-verification/

It only takes a minute. If i-Cool for Menopause did
not work for you, make sure you get your portion of the settlement funds before
April 4th or it will be too late! Here is the notice:

NOTICE
OF CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT
Doe v. DSM Nutritional Products, LLC et al.
Case No. 30-2011-00510631-CU-MT-CXC (Orange County Superior Court)

If
you bought DSM Nutritional Products, LLC’s “i-Cool for Menopause” product you
could be entitled to money from a legal settlement.

A Settlement has been proposed in a class
action lawsuit with DSM Nutritional Products, LLC (“DSM” or “Defendant”)
involving DSM’s product, i-Cool for Menopause. A class action lawsuit pending
in the Superior Court of California for the County of Orange entitled Doe v. DSM Nutritional Products,
LLC et al. (Case No.
30-2011-00510631-CU-MT-CXC) may affect your rights. Plaintiff Jane Doe claims
that Defendant misrepresented i-Cool for Menopause’s efficacy for the reduction
of menopausal symptoms, specifically hot flashes. DSM vigorously denies these
allegations and the Court has not decided who is right.

A class action lawsuit was filed against
DSM Nutritional Products, LLC (“DSM” or “Defendant”). In this lawsuit,
Plaintiff claims, among other things, that the phrase “clinically proven to
safely reduce hot flashes by up to 85%” on Defendants package was false or
misleading in violation of California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act (Cal. Civ.
Code §§ 1750, et seq.)
and California Unfair Competition Law (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17500, et seq.) The Action further
alleges that Defendant’s alleged misrepresentations were designed to, and did,
lead Plaintiff and others similarly situated (collectively the “Class”) to
believe that the Product could cause an 85% reduction in hot flashes when it
could not. DSM Nutritional Products, LLC denies that the phrase or any other
representations are false, misleading or otherwise unlawful and the Court has not decided who is
right.

Your
Options In This Settlement

File a Claim. You must file a claim to
remain in the Class. You will be bound by the Court’s rulings, but you can
object to the Settlement. Claim Forms must be signed and postmarked (or
submitted online) by April 4, 2016. By remaining in the Class, you will release
claims against Defendant as outlined in the detailed Notice, which is available here.

Exclude yourself and keep your right to
sue the Defendant. Your written request for exclusion must be postmarked by
April 4, 2016.

Object to the Settlement and/or appear in
Court, only if you remain in the Class. You may hire your own attorney for
these purposes, but do not have to. Your written request to object or appear
must be postmarked by April 29, 2016. The Court will hold a hearing (the
“Fairness Hearing”) on May 20, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. (PST) in Department CX-102 at
the courthouse located at 751 W Santa Ana Blvd, Santa Ana, CA 92701 to decide
whether to approve the Settlement and determine the amount of attorneys’ fees
and Plaintiff’s incentive awards.

These options are explained in the Notice of Class Action Settlement

Important
Dates:
Deadline to file and
postmark objections (including any requests to appear before the Court): April 29, 2016
Deadline to submit a claim: April 4, 2016
Deadline to postmark requests for exclusion: April 4, 2016
Final Approval Hearing: May 20, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. (PST)

For full information about the settlement, visit: http://i-coolclassaction.com/

Comment

Related Discussions
Lawnmower Class Action lawsuit
Q
Comments (13)
I am not proud nor ashamed of the check. I did NOT start the suit nor was I an active party to it. I received a post card more than a year ago telling me that I was a "member" of the class (by virtue of purchasing one or more covered mowers during a certain period of time). I could opt out and file my own suit or accept some money from the manufacturers WHO HAD ALREADY THROWN IN THE TOWEL. If I did not take my share of money it would be divided among the other "members." I did not ask the manufacturers to put the money on the table but I would be stupid not to pick it up. And a lot of other folks must feel the same way. The "up to" estimate of the settlement for two riding mowers and one push mower was $185. That tells me a lot more folks than expected decided to take their money.
...See More
KitchenAid self clean oven Class Action Lawsuit Canada
Q
Comments (17)
I was really hoping to find a class-action lawsuit I could join - not so much for the money but more to assuage the fury that I feel when I think of how unhappy I am with my "premium" piece of junk Kitchenaid stove. In 2018, when we renovated our kitchen, we decided to “go big” on the appliances, and went with Kitchen-Aid. Up until then, we had been using the old same stove and fridge that came with the house 14 years prior. Neither of the old appliances was a premium brand but they had served us well, and neither had even once required a call to the repairman. Other than the fact that no amount of levelling will allow the door to properly close, I have been fairly happy with the refrigerator. My greatest anticipation, however, lay with the prospect of a new stove with a self-clean feature. Oh BOY! No more sticking my head in an oven covered in corrosive goo and fumes. No more crouching painfully on my knees to scour away the greasy grime. Or so I thought. Then I discovered “Aqua-Lift”, the most useless piece of technology ever conceived of, except for perhaps the Rotato. No. I take that back. The Rotato does what it says it will. I will not even pursue the fact that the Kitchen-Aid broiler sets fire to everything I put in there before it has a chance to actually broil properly, or that the stovetop elements are so hot on the lowest setting that I can’t properly simmer most dishes. Whirlpool’s Aqua-Lift “self-cleaning” feature alone is enough to convince me to never again buy Kitchen-Aid or any other Whirlpool brand. Aqua-Lift, for the uninitiated, is a Whirlpool brainfart that depends on steam to break down the baked-on grease that accumulates inside your oven. If you’ve ever tried the youtube hack where you put a bowl of water in your oven and heat it up so that the steam makes it possible to just wipe it sparkling clean “with NO scrubbing!”, you will know that this method is about as effective as waving a magic wand over the mess. The instructions that come with the stove warn most emphatically that you should not use any kind of cleaning spray or foam to clean the stove or door glass as this can impair the cleaning process and/or damage the surface, and nullify the warranty. And there it is, your Catch-22 – because no amount of steam can reverse the chemical change that occurs when grease gets baked on to the sides of your oven. So, after several earnest tries and and equal number of abysmal failures, I got the big chemical guns out again. I’m back on my hands and knees with my head inside the oven, scrubbing and cursing, and hoping that the cleaner will eat through the grease before it eats through my gloves. I fervently pray that this piece of junk stove breaks down soon so that I can pitch it onto the street for delivery to its most appropriate destination – the dump!!!
...See More
Andersen Faces Class action Argon Lawsuit
Q
Comments (2)
I don't imagine you could take that measurement without breaking the seal. The inadequate seals are the bigger concern, though since they mean air leakage from outdoors is possible. In talking with a local window and door distributor who reps. a number of lines, including Andersen and Marvin, he said that Marvin windows are far superior. I've gotten that from lots of experienced builders as well. But he said he found Andersen doors to be superior to Marvin's. So much for one stop shopping! Windows are more important, though.
...See More
Pella Class action lawsuit?
Q
Comments (27)
keep- I agree, (mostly) tight houses need to be designed correctly. Including wall structure, cladding system, window system, hvac system, and even the interior wall finish type. A very small percentage of builders know enough about tight construction to do it right. However opening a window once a week.......gotta to disagree with you there. That defeats the purpose of tight homes dont you think? You need to install an ERV or HRV, depending on your location. This runs every day, and regulates your air quality. Further more, the moisture levels need to be kept in line. I have Pella double hungs in some parts of the house that are about 8 years old, and the rest are 3 years old. 0 issues, not even condensation. proper install is a key element to any window. I am working on a new house design to start this spring, and I plan on using Pella again, however not the clad but rather their fiberglass Impervia casement windows. These appear to have a pretty basic and flawless design with good hardware. Obviously no rotting issues at all. They are also releasing a vinyl line this summer I hear.
...See More

I-Cool for Menopause Class Action Lawsuit

Comment

Related Discussions

COMPANY

BUSINESS SERVICES

GET HELP

CONNECT WITH US