SHOP PRODUCTS
Houzz Logo Print
christiebuckley1

Advice Needed on Parging the Smoke Chamber

christiebuckley1
8 years ago

We are renovating our home we purchased that was built in 1940's. We recently had our chimney inspected and the inspection came back as follows:

1) First two tiles from smoke chamber have cracks running top to bottom and there are gaps between the first flue tile and chimney inside the smoke chamber. These would need to be removed, replaced or relined.

2) Smoke chamber is not parged. There are gaps/missing mortar between bricks.

3) Fireplace does not have a "traditional damper"; it currently has a Lyemance Damper

4) Firebox has loose brick on the the floor, cracked brick on the back wall and loose and missing mortar.

* Due to its current condition this fireplace should be considered "not functional".

We got a quote that gave us two options:

1) Demo and haul off existing chimney and construct a new chimney for $11,100.

2) Remove the back of the existing chimney to access and remove the existing flue liners and replace them with new ones. Demo the existing firebox and construct a new firebox and install a new "traditional style damper" for $6,330.

Both of these options seem incredibly high in terms of cost. Option 2 almost seems unnecessary (there's got to be an easier way) and expensive for what needs to be done.

Does anyone have any insight about cost for the above results? Isn't there a way to parge the smoke chamber without removing the back of the chimney AND if we parge the smoke chamber, won't this also take care of the cracks running top to bottom of smoke chamber?

I'm also confused why our contractor is recommending we remove existing flue liners when the chimney inspector doesn't say anything is wrong with them.

Lastly, if the firebox has loose brick on the floor, cracked brick on the back wall and loose and missing mortar, can't these bricks just be replaced or filled with mortar? Is it necessary to construct a new firebox? Keep in mind this is not a huge fireplace.

There has got to be an easier / more cost effective way of fixing this.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Comments (3)