Houzz Logo Print

Living near power lines - how close is too close?

16 years ago

I'm house hunting and found a house that I absolutely love. The house itself is amazing - it's suits all of our needs and then some, it's in a good location, neighborhood has excellent schools, the lot is a little smaller than I would like but it's ok. The minus - there are high voltage power lines a 1/4 mile away and you can actually see the very tip of one of the metal structures from the back yard. There's a great playground in the development with tennis courts and a basketball court, BUT it's even closer to the power lines and you can see more that structure much better from there.

This is a deal breaker for me because

1) I don't want to take any health risks with my family especially since we have a history of cancer

2) It's an eye sore

My realtor and my husband said that it's far enough away to not matter, but I disagree. I nixed the house, but I still find myself thinking about it a lot. I'll definitely never find a house like that again, in the location that I want, and in my price range. ::sigh::

What do you think? Do you think a 1/4 mile is too close? What do you consider too close to live to power lines?

Comments (62)

  • westranch
    16 years ago

    When I was younger, I worked at a radio station. The transmitter and tower were on sight. If you turned on a radio in the studio, you'd hear the transmitter, or RF all over the dial. RF is the same as EMF, only audible through a receiving device like a radio. You can hear EMF in other appliances, like a television or stereo, but it would sound like static. I worked in radio for eight years with no hair falling out or cancers. I think sitting in your car at a red light is more dangerous statistically speaking.
    The only negative to me, would be how it looked. If it looked alright, I'd probably have no problem with it. In the 1950's when Fidel Castro was transmitting millions of watts of amplituded modulation, Miamians were probably more exposed to RF or EMF, than any of us now.

  • goldgirl
    16 years ago

    We lived behind power lines that were located behind a fairly deep wooded buffer. They were visible only during the winter months. However, there was also a transformer station behind the buffer, about 3 houses down. It never really bothered us until they did maintenance and suddenly there was a constant low humming noise. We moved, so I don't know if it was ever resolved. Just something to keep in mind.

  • Related Discussions

    Live oak too close to house?


    Comments (16)
    I think a good compromise is to use Quercus Berberidifolia (scrub oak) instead if you have limited space in smaller residential lot. They have a low root damage potential (see CalPoly's SelectTree for info on the root damage potential for trees and shrubs) and can still reach heights of 10-15 feet. Even though this thread is quite old, I feel like I should point out a few misleading statements in the above comments in case someone finds this thread while looking for info in the future: 1.) Quercus Agrifolia is a VERY long-lived tree when properly maintained without a lawn underneath or an aggressive summer watering regime. The Pechanga Reservation has a tree with an age estimated between 500-1000 years old. Our beautiful backyard tree (30 feet away from house for those who are interested) is around 300 years old and has a crown of 75 feet and a height of around 60 feet. The tree's natural leaf litter is preserved beneath the dripline of our tree and this ensures the tree's roots are properly oxygenated and helps maintain appropriate moisture levels for the tree. Great resources for those who are interested in maintaining any oaks they currently have or who are looking to install some in the future are the Las Pilitas Nursery website, the Theodore Payne Foundation, and the California Oaks project pdf on on Oak Tree Care. 2.) I understand why people might be concerned about planting a large tree 10 feet away from their house. It is a serious shame when developers have erected houses so close to old established trees that were no doubt already significantly sized. If your lot is small plant smaller Scrub Oak. If you have the space for a large oak or another large native tree thats wonderful. Large trees and oaks particularly are essential for wildlife, help shade our houses (and thus decrease AC cooling costs), and provide a vast support network that allows other shrubs and trees to grow which would otherwise die due to the intense heat and lack of water. If you enjoy hearing birds sing in the morning, seeing butterflies (monarchs which roost in our tree), or using your backyard on hot summer days, you will understand the value of native oak trees which act as life support systems for many plants, birds, insects, and mammals (some of which rely solely on these trees to survive). Lastly, big trees also act as a windbreak for Santa Ana winds, give us privacy, and decrease road noise for the many Californians who live near loud freeways or streets 3.) In rural areas oak tree woodlands are often cleared to make way for wineries and agriculture in Ca but one of the greatest threats to the trees (as one commenter above referenced) is development. Building a 5,000 sqft house on a 6,000 sqft lot does not leave room for large trees and often results in large swaths of city being completely stripped of all trees and much hotter as a result of decreased shade and reflected heat from paved surfaces. Around 50 years ago there were hundreds of oaks in our neighborhood. Today there are around 20 left and we see many die each year from improper pruning (we call the unethical "tree trimmers" butchers around here--they will harm a tree for profit) or overwatering to maintain an unused lawn that has been installed underneath the tree. Many cities do not protect oaks or do not enforce the laws they currently have in place because they do not have the necessary resources or because they do not value the trees more than property tax revenue.
    ...See More

    Planting of palms near the house: How close?


    Comments (19)
    That is definitely true too. Some of them however do keep their more rigid leaf profile even as larger plants as in the case of Nainital and..... The "Bulgarian Trachys"growing in Plovdiv. Interesting, he actually mentions the mountain genetics on this site. Hopefully this link(under the weather sticker) works- Here is a link that might be useful: Bulgarian Trachys
    ...See More

    Seating - how close is too close?


    Comments (6)
    Speaking purely about clearances, if there is at least 5' (60") b/w the edge of the peninsula seating and the table edge, then you can probably fit stools there. As to whether you need stools with the table so close, that's a personal decision. While table seating is different than counter seating (table being more comfortable in general), sometimes both can be useful. We have two seats at our peninsula...with only 50" b/w the peninsula and table. I can tell you those 50" are not enough if someone is sitting at both. Even moving the table so the chandelier is off-center only gains us 5"...still not enough. Because of this issue, we don't use both seats at the same time. However, when we're not using the table, the peninsula is convenient for breakfast, homework, projects, etc....and it's nice to have seating there at those times. [Our mistake was not moving the chandelier when we took a few inches from the DR for the kitchen...if we had re-centered the chandelier, we could have placed the table so we had 60" between peninsula & table. Live and learn!]
    ...See More

    RE: Living near power lines - how close is too close?


    Comments (11)
    There are different types of Leukemia. So far I haven't found which type was supposedly linked to power lines. I lost my dad to Leukemia in 2006. During the time he was diagnosed I learned a lot about his type which was AML and related to Benzene. He was a mechanic; it was in products we used at the gas station. I worked there 20 years; chances are I will eventually show symptoms :( After my dad died, there were more then 10 people I knew that died from some form of cancer. All of these years I didn't know one person, now there are so many. Except for my dad, I don't recall anyone else that had a type of cancer that was linked to a known cause. If any of you know anyone that worked with Benzene, please have them read up on AML and let them know they need to get their blood tested regularly. People that work/ed in the service station / gasoline field; or a painter are the 2 main professions this affects. I hope that one day cancer will be a thing of the past. My children do not need to lose any more people to this horrible disease. Here is a link that might be useful: Leukemia causes
    ...See More
  • spanky67
    16 years ago

    Great post Kudzu. Conspiracy theorists sound even more kookie in print than in person.

    HOWEVER, I think there is one point that hasn't been brought up. Here in the lovely state of Connecticut there has been a big dust up over power lines. Apparently, our fairly old lines have grown inadequate with our ravenous appetite for power. As a result, there is a proposal by the power companies to dramatically upgrade the power coming through those lines. I don't know the particulars accept to say there has been lots and lots of media coverage here about it. You could probably Google it to find the particulars.

    I bring this up only to let you know that those towers might not be their existing height forever, and the amount of power humming through those lines might someday need to be increased.

  • cherylnsw
    16 years ago

    A friend of mine was looking for a new house, she found one that looked nice in the realtor's photo so she went for an inspection. The inside was a bit of a shocker - badly laid vinyl and the colour scheme was something else, they had based it on the flags of their home countries. But the real shock came when she went outside - the back yard was completely bare - grass and nothing else. She asked why there was nothing in the yard, she was told to look up, high voltage power lines went straight across the yard. She was told that they aren't allowed to add anything to the yard, no sheds, play equipment etc, but he said it was cool at night because you can walk out holding a fluorescent tube and it will light up !!

  • kitchenshock
    16 years ago

    Here is a sample of how much power goes through those powerlines. According to these powerlines can have nearly 700,000 volts flowing thought them.

    Here is a link that might be useful: Opening Isolator

  • logic
    16 years ago

    Power line discussions are somewhat akin to discussions about religion and or politics. Many people have very strong beliefs about their effects..or lack thereof....and others could not care less if a tower was parked on their front lawn.

    That said, what it really boils down to is ones own personal tolerance...and perception. If one would not feel "safe" living in proximity...then one should not buy a home where they will not feel safe...regardless of how rational or irrational such a decision may seem to others.

    In addition, if for you the view of the tower is going to detract from the enjoyment of the property, then that property is probably not the best property to buy.

    Last but not least...resale value. One day you may wish to sell....and in doing so you will have a more limited market then you would with a house that is not in proximity and/or view of power towers.....because there will always be people who find power towers wise, visually or both.

    Therefore, its more about perception than any actual facts or studies...and also about the point mentioned by spanky67 and the possiblity of an increase in the voltage at some point...

    IMO, as they say in real estate, location, location, location...and one that is somewhat controversial..especially with regard to perceived adverse health effects,real or not, location is clearly not this property's strong point.

  • brickeyee
    16 years ago

    "Here is a sample of how much power goes through those powerlines. According to these powerlines can have nearly 700,000 volts flowing thought them."

    Voltage is not supposed to be the boogeyman, it is current now.
    By going to very high voltages the current is reduced and losses go down.
    Power is measured in watts, the product of voltage and current (with some other factors thrown in for how well the waveforms are aligned).

  • patty_cakes
    16 years ago

    Coming from a small town with a higher-than-average incidence of cancer, I would forget the house, no matter how much you love it. In our subdivision, the power lines were at the end of our street which was 1 block. The incidence of cancer in that development was mind boggleing! It seemed to take the path on the diagonal, affecting children and adults, everything from leukemia to breast cancer. We only lived there 7 years and I thank God we were given the opportunity for a job transfer. Having 5 children, and realizing this at just about the time of the move, we probably would have moved out of the town into the country. Since that move, every single one of my neighbors have died, and i've been told others have been diagonosed/died from the disease. A beautiful home in a prestidegeous neighborhood should NEVER be a reason for putting ones health, and the health of loved ones, at risk. ;o)


  • muddbelly
    16 years ago

    I put an offer in on a great house, and then I saw the high voltage power line towers out back (they were hidden by trees). I did some googlin' and came to the conclusion that there IS a risk, since most of the "no risk" authors were tied to the electric industry. It would cost them a huge amount to admit the risk. Just find another place - I have found SEVERAL houses online that appeared to be steals that turned out to be near power lines. There is NO DOUBT that there is a negative affect on home values...

  • kurtv
    16 years ago

    Several of the posts in this thread say much about the current and recent state of science and math education.

  • kaleberg
    16 years ago

    Dear Logic,
    May Heaven bless you for saying, "could not care less," as opposed to the abominable "could care less."

  • logic
    16 years ago

    kaleberg: "May Heaven bless you for saying, "could not care less," as opposed to the abominable "could care less."

    Heavens blessings are always more than welcome. :-D

  • sparksals
    16 years ago

    madmartian - if the trees are anything like oak, pine, birch, willow, mesquite, they grow alot over time. Seriously, we don't even notice the towers at all. They are there, but because they are always there, they just blend into everything else.

    I never knew people had power lines coming from their house until a few years ago because I thought everyone had buried electricity. I would think cables coming from the house to the back alley would be quite dangerous over time with the growth of trees, lightening storms, etc.

    Of course, it is a very personal decision. But I can tell you with certainty and conviction that over time you won't notice them. They also have absolutely NOT affected the value of homes in my parent's area. It is VERY desirable and homes sell for outrageous amounts in hours.

  • dreamgarden
    16 years ago

    I do not think there is anything wrong with wanting to reduce your exposure to potentially harmful things. I also give you credit for not responding to the following caustic statements:

    ""Remember that these effects are cumulative..." Based on what? Tea leaves? No study will ever prove that EMF (Electro-Magnetic Fields) are 100% safe."
    Do you really mean that no study will ever prove this until YOU discover it first? We will NEVER get a man on the moon either right?
    The Surgeon General has warned that radon is the second leading cause of lung cancer in the United States. But then what does HE know. "Someone needs t get lung cancer?" No comment.

    "pharaoh, Was that a joke? The only thing missing from your post was something on the aliens in Area 54 and the Tri-Lateral Commission. It's bad enough that you believe your own bunk, please don't spread it to the ignorant and gullible. Thank you though for providing further evidence that there's nothing common about common sense. Several of the posts in this thread say much about the current and recent state of science and math education.

    There is much evidence that some people do not understand how uncommon common courtesy is. I find it interesting that kudzu9, an environmental scientist, managed to make his point without belittling anyone.

  • kurtv
    16 years ago

    Some statements are worthy or derision; especially ones that are potentially harmful to others.

  • jane__ny
    16 years ago

    We live on a street with high power towers on the corner. They carry the electricity to NYC and connect up with Indian Point Power Plant. We have lived here 33 yrs. Many of our neighbors have lived here longer. I don't know of anyone who died of cancer on this street or neighborhood. We raised our children here and we are all still alive. We also have well water. I am more concerned about the quality of water than the power lines.
    Personally, I wouldn't worry about it.


  • hollyinontario
    16 years ago

    We live almost directly under one of those "towers". Small fenced back yard with nice greenbelt. No health issues have surfaced in over 25 yrs. We love the privacy this provides. The fact that neighbourhood kids aren't bordering all sides of us probably lowers or BP. We love meeting/greeting our neighbours who walk their dogs along the greenbelt. The only "drawback" as we see it is those motorbikes that young pre-teens have driven up and down. Fortunately the novelty seems to wear off quickly on those. You wouldn't have that problem. I'd rather look at the tower than some neighbour that doesn't maintain their back yard in reasonable shape.

  • brickeyee
    16 years ago

    " Do you really mean that no study will ever prove this until YOU discover it first?"

    No, you cannot prove a negative. Guess logic was not a strong point.

    I get very tired of the hysterical pseudo-science that seems to be cropping up over and over. We had ÂCurrent of Death" published about 20 years ago.
    The earth has a magnetic field. Simply moving around in this field produces the same types of currents in the human body as power lines. Unless you want to stop moving (sorry about that beating heart) you will generate currents. We have no reason to think these currents (or any currents at these levels) have a significant health impact.

    Dixie Lee Ray wrote a book about 15 years ago debunking a lot of the pseudo-science that was around then. In one great demonstration she took a list of actors whom had all died of cancer and put them in alphabetical order. No pattern was found. But if the list was alphabetized by the second letter of the last name almost all the cancer cases were found in the second half of the alphabet, most between just a few letters. Sounds like having the wrong letters in your name is Âlinked to cancer. An obviously incorrect conclusion.

    ÂCancer s used to describe the unregulated (by the body) multiplication of cells. It is a catch all name that describes what is happening.
    There is no reason to expect cancers in different tissue types to have common (or even similar) causes.

    Human papilloma virus is strongly linked to cervical cancer.
    Chronic Benzene exposure is linked to a number of cancers including liver cancer.
    Asbestos is strongly linked with mesothelioma.
    Adenocarcinoma is linked with a number of solvents, but is also very common in older white women.
    Certain genetic signatures are linked with breast cancer.

    The EPA predicted radon lung cancer deaths would occur in the Redding Prong formation. They model also predicted that this should be around 20% of total lung cancers. The number was larger than all the lung cancer cases in the area.
    All models are wrong, some models are useful.

    Research has repeatedly shown that radio waves and fields strong enough to cause tissue heating can lead to cell mutations.
    Repeated controlled studies have failed to come to any reliable conclusion that exposures well below these levels have any effect.

  • logic
    16 years ago

    IMO, it seems over the years that a number of controlled studies that have come to "reliable" conclusions have subsequently been supplanted by more controlled studies showing that the earlier "reliable" conclusions may not be so reliable after all...

    That said, it is easy to understand why the average person.... who is not a medical professional or a scientist or an engineer.... is not certain what to believe anymore about the results of myriads of studies that they are bombarded with on a daily basis. Consequently, the ad hominem attacks seen in this thread are more than a bit out of line.

    In the end, a person has to feel safe in their own homeÂ.and for those who may have any doubt in their mind about the safety of anythingÂ...even if it is indeed a disputed safety....they will most likely be far happier living somewhere where they do not perceive a risk.
    It is as simple as that.

  • kudzu9
    16 years ago

    Good points. Another related issue is concepts of risk. The lifetime risk of dying in a car crash is about 1 in 100, but we get in cars every day. The lifetime risk of getting cancer from a power line (if it exists at all) might be 1 in a million. Which do we worry about more? A lot if it boils down to the familiar risk, vs. the scary, unfamiliar risk. And I say this not to make light of anyone's concern about power lines, but rather to support your point that, even after we review all the science, most of these situations still boil down to "What am I comfortable with?"

    The issue with scientific studies is that health impacts from many potential risks are very subtle at best, and you can't get absolute answers in situations like this. People want certainty (Will X, Y, or Z kill me or not?), and it's just not possible.

  • logic
    16 years ago

    kudzu9: "The issue with scientific studies is that health impacts from many potential risks are very subtle at best, and you can't get absolute answers in situations like this. People want certainty (Will X, Y, or Z kill me or not?), and it's just not possible."

    Excellent point.

  • disneyrsh
    16 years ago

    Here in atlanta living under power lines is pretty common. I can't opine as to the risks, but I can tell you that houses within sight of the power lines sell for less, and take longer to sell. For example, a house selling for 425 not in view of the powerlines (I think about 1/2-3/4 mile away) would sell for 350 backing up to the powerlines themselves. That's a pretty big dent in value for identical homes. Even right now in our neighborhood where houses are going under contract in days where it used to take months, the powerline houses are sitting there. So, from a value/resale point of view, I'd avoid it if you're planning a move in the next 10 years or so....

  • devorah
    16 years ago

    I don't have a health issue with the power lines, but I can't handle the noise they generate or the buzz that sets up in my body. I hate just driving under them. We did turn down a house once because it was too close. When I mention "the buzz" to some people they look at me like I'm nuts - and ohers agree. I have no idea. I don't think that I am imagining it. Since my car radio cuts out when I am near one, I assume the same thing would happen inside a house that was too near. Can someone comment on this please.

  • patty_cakes
    16 years ago

    Devorah, I know EXACTLY what you mean by the 'buzz'. It once woke me and one of my sons' and went on for at least fifteen minutes. When it stopped we both felt sick and sort of dizzy. I only heard it once in seven years, but maybe I slept thru it the other times. I never heard anyone else in the neighborhood mention it. ;o)


  • brickeyee
    16 years ago

    Under some conditions the insulators on high voltage lines start to 'leak'. Fog is a common cause, or even a heavy enough rain. You are hearing arcing, and at night sometimes it can even be seen.
    In seaside areas the insulators require washing to remove the salt or they stop insulating very well.
    The AM radio stops working since it uses a loop-stick antenna. This couples to the magnetic field of the AM signal. The power lines field is stronger and saturates the ferrite stick and overloads the radio and throws the antenna tuning off. The same affect occurs near heavy steel beams.

  • trueself
    15 years ago


    EPA Says the Threat Is Real

    By 1990, over one hundred studies had been conducted worldwide. Of these, at least two dozen epidemiological studies on humans indicated a link between EMFs (including power lines) and serious health problems. In response to public pressure, the Environmental Protection Agency IEPA) began reviewing and evaluating the available literature.

    In a draft report issued in March 1990, the EPA recommended that EMFs be classified as a Class B carcinogen -- -a "probable human carcinogen and joined the ranks of formaldehyde, DDT, dioxins and PCBs.

    After the EPA draft report was released, utility, military and computer lobbyists came down hard on the EPA. The EPA's final revision did NOT classify EMFs as a Class B carcinogen Rather, the following explanation was added:"

    At this time such a characterization regarding the link between cancer and exposure to EMFs is not appropriate because the basic nature of the interaction between EMFs and biological processes leading to cancer is not understood."

    Curiously, this rather unusual logic appears on the same page as the following: "In conclusion, several studies showing leukemia, Iymphoma and cancer of the nervous system in children exposed to supported by similar findings in adults in several/ occupational studies also involving electrical power frequency exposures, show a consistent pattern of response that suggest a causal link. "

    When questioned about the contradictory nature of these statements, the EPA responded that it was "not appropriate" to use the probable carcinogen label until it could demonstrate how EMFs caused cancer and exactly how much EMF is harmful.

  • berniek
    15 years ago

    trueself, what is a "safe" distance from power lines?

  • liketolearn
    15 years ago

    We looked at a nice new home that was priced low. The power line was actually right next to the house. It was a misty/foggy day and there was a loud hum from the power lines. Did not even consider the house as the hum would have driven me crazy.

    We live now within 1/4 mile of power line towers. View is blocked by trees but drive by them daily and never even notice.

    I'd have to look at the home to decide. I would not want to be too close but I'd be OK with seeing the towers in the distance.

    And cherrynsw ... love that story of the fluorescent tube! That will surely freak out visitors and be a great party trick!

  • cnvh
    15 years ago

    My parents have a 100-acre farm that is bisected by a large power line; their house sits about 500' from the power lines, but one of the barns is only about 100' away. Almost directly underneath the lines, they have a large pond stocked with catfish, and a little gazebo next to the pond.

    In any damp weather, the lines hum and crackle, which can be heard from outside the house but not inside. For the most part, they don't even notice the power lines anymore, except when they're by the pond... a metal gas lantern hangs inside the gazebo, and if you put your finger near the lantern, you can feel little electrical shocks from the lantern to the tip of your finger; at night, you can even see the trails.

    The fish in the pond seem perfectly healthy; none have been found with lesions or any other problems. If anything, they're growing like mad, which od course makes for fun fishing. :)

    They've talked to professionals, who've told them everything is normal and not to worry about it since their house is far enough away. But it's still weird.

    If the price was right, I wouldn't think twice about buying a house near power lines... would I want to be underneath them? No-- but nearby wouldn't bother me at all.

  • saphire
    15 years ago

    You can have someone come in to your house during a time of normal usage, for example 6pm in the winter and measure your Elecro magnetic fields. The EPA did put out an acceptable level and if your is well below that it should be fine. We just have a lot of power wires, normal ones not a tower, near our property and something hanging off that looks like a trash can. I was nervous so the home inspecter brought one of those measuring tools. The levels were barely detectable and normal based on usage not the wiring from outside. At one point it did spike, turns out he was next to the dishwasher which we were testing to see if it worked!

    DH's cousins almost bought a small inexpensive house across the street from a powerline. The levels in one of the bedrooms was above the EPA standard. They did not buy. Anecdotally that area is now said to have a lot of cancer but I have not seen statistics on it

  • mfbenson
    15 years ago

    If EMF is so dangerous why are cancer rates among power plant workers no higher than the rest of the population?

    We don't even have correlation, let alone causation.

    Power lines are to some degree an eyesore, but so are at lot of other things.

  • kurtv
    15 years ago


    Oh my, we have another one.

    If you're really interested in understanding the issue instead of parroting conspiracy theories, read the article I linked to in my first post in this thread. It has a list of actual references complete with links to actual studies instead of "quotes" from mysterious (and quite possibly non-existent) EPA documents.

  • hamptonmeadow
    15 years ago

    It never ceases to astound me that so many people are willing to see conspiracy theories and show fear about something they don't understand. Perhaps it does, indeed, reflect our educational system. Our children are growing up "bored" and with no curiosity. They and the young parents today are easy prey to the fears of this complex world.

    Rather than attack the more off the wall posters in this thread, I would say the OP should just do whatever she wants to do. Who really cares? I don't mean that personally, just that what difference does it make if she doesn't like the property because of power lines. She has to live there. Let her do what makes her comfortable.

    Personally, I live in Minnesota, the land of ten thousand lakes. I am pretty damn sure somebody let their pet aligator loose in one of those lakes. I don't live in fear of terrorism or being murdered or my grandchildren snatched. The odds are against everyone of those things, by millions. Get over it.

  • brickeyee
    15 years ago

    You should educate yourself about the EPA and the number of mistakes they have made.
    The EPA yelled and screamed that asbestos should be removed from all schools. Any type, any place, get it out.
    After the education folks spent billions of dollars on remediation, the EPA decided it would have been better to leave the material alone and encapsulate in place any material that could be judged friable. They never offered to return the money spent.
    The EPA ordered water Total Dissolved Solids decreased with no factual data a hazard was present. A number of jurisdictions upgraded treatment plants in anticipation. Pin hole leaks in copper water pipes followed.
    The Washington Aqueduct decided to comply and upgrade the treatment plant. Lead level in Washington, DC shot up.
    After much finger pointing the Aqueduct added additional chemicals back into the water to stop the corrosion that released the lead.
    The EPA water quality folks never talked to the EPA corrosion folks about possible impacts of making the water ÂcleanerÂ. Very clean water (reverse osmosis or distilled) is actually rather aggressive in causing corrosion of pipes and equipment. This has been well known for many years. The EPA water quality folks never seemed to have heard of it though.
    The EPA exists at this point mostly to perpetuate itself. Without a Âcrisis du jour they cannot justify budget increases, or even the continued existence of the agency.
    Having removed over 90% of the tailpipe pollutants from cars, they continue to pursue the remaining 10% with zero regard to cost or safety. Lighter cars get better mileage. They also are more dangerous in accidents.
    But what are a few more highway deaths if we can extend the average American life by a few more days?

  • muddbelly
    15 years ago

    For all of you wanting an "unbiased" news source...

  • demark
    15 years ago

    I know nothing about EMF other than the field strength is inversely proportional to the square of the distance away from lines. All the calculations and conclusions presented could be wrong.

    Consider this:

    You probably sleep with your head about a foot away from a 120V line.
    Assume your property is 100' away from a million volt line that is 50' in the air.

    At equidistant points away from each line, the high voltage line will have an EMF approximately 8333 times larger than the 120V line. In other words, EMF 1' away from the million volt line is 8333 times the EMF 1' away from the 120V line.

    If you live 100' from a high voltage line that is 50' in the air, the total EMF from that line will be:

    (1/((100 * 100) + (50 * 50))) * 8333 = 67% that of the 120V line

    At 200' away: 20% of the 120V line
    At 500' away: 3% of the 120V line
    At 1320' away (1/4 mile): .5% of the 120V line

    In other words, unless you have the high voltage line running through your house, you probably end up with larger EMF from your home wiring.

    - Tony

  • muddbelly
    15 years ago

    I have 2 small children and would never risk a 69% increase in leukemia whether it is caused by the power lines, or not. Every house I see next to the big power lines sell for significantly less than comps w/o the lines. If you buy, make sure you get the discount on the purchase, because when you sell - you'll feel it.

  • scrier
    15 years ago

    Brickeye makes a good point about the EPA boneheads (and I'm kind of a tree hugger). EPA outlawed the CCA pressure treated lumber because of the arsenic that was in the CCA. I guess there must have been a problem with people bending over and licking their decks. Anyhow, the new safe to lick pressure treated lumber will corrode metal fasteners unless the fasteners are stainless steel (supposedly galvanized fasteners are OK but I wouldn't bet on it)

  • saphire
    15 years ago

    Actually people let their children on their decks who crawl around and then stick their fingers in their mouths. Or even lick the deck, have you been around a 1 year old recently?

    I had no idea about the new lumber but apparently a few years ago a cedar playground company had a recall on its equipment because the rungs were made of Aspen or Ash (I think) and when you put that between cedar planks it rots! Go figure, so sometimes even the well intentioned make mistakes (not saying te EPA is or is not)

    Seriously one of the best things they did in 2003 was get rid of CCA in playground equipment and picnic tables. Who cares what your fence is constructed of. I only use preservative free wood for these functions

  • johnqpublic
    15 years ago

    ...anyone see, or hear, ANY class-action lawsuits for major illnesses of retired railroad and power utility workers (the railroad power grids are stronger than those of utilities!), EVER?, especially with many, many retired workmen retired after more than 40 years? ...any REAL evidence of trees, bushes, grass... home gardens... frogs, foxes, deer, squirrels, cows... mutating insanely? ...mutating at all? from power lines? Did you ever see any or hear about any such incidents? Of course not. ...any missing persons cases of retired linemen/women vanishing into thin air from spontaneous combustion from years, decades!, of work on Power lines, Railroad lines, and Telephone lines? ...think hard... be honest with yourselves!, and search deep within your minds for the obvious answer: No. Of course, the Idiots who would say and/or do anything to get out from under, especially for the lawsuit/health insurance/life insurance money from a big business, government, or utility and from fraudulent and false insurance claims (don't laugh!, many people still fake their own deaths, especially for their own life insurance money by filing false death certificates and documentation of cremation because the big life insurance companies pay life insurance claims after a cremation! Ask any big insurance company, or any of their salesmen/women!) never tell you how they really ended up sick with internal infections, as forms of cancer, which almost never heal, and are usually fatal, not only internal infections/ulcerations like stomach ulcers, when they were careless and wreckless and worked in asbestos factories, nor do they tell you the documented medical and legal fact 75% of all tumors contain talc particles from baby powder which contains talcum powder. Asbestos is highly regulated for limited use these days. Pure talcum powder has not been sold in the U.S. since 1971, but is still used in baby powder to heal diaper rash, and was never meant to use for many years, and definitely not meant for a lifetime of use. Think of all of the Idiots who ended up with brain tumors and lung tumors from snorting baby powder to cut cocaine with so as not to die from a cocaine overdose from 100% pure cocaine. 'How close is too close?' 1979 is the first time anyone ever tried to blame power utilities for cancer, and power lines have been in use since before 1900! ...and, in 1980, there was another U.S. propaganda film, 'Too close for comfort'. ...and sorry, folks, but trying to blame big tobacco companies because the small-town asbestos factory was shut down and went out of business long ago, long before the factory workers got sick, doesn't work, as annoying as second-hand smoke is, especially from stale tobacco, which often results in abdominal pain, and diarrhea. Think of all of the very, VERY old people who continue to smoke, even cigars, from the days before they were adolescents, and never got cancer! Open your eyes, look around, and look things up for yourselves.

    Here is a...

  • marys1000
    15 years ago

    Skimming here there are some things to think about

    The eye sore part:

    -You can barely see the towers now
    so there must be some current trees between the house and the towers
    --but what if something happens to the trees? Disease, more development, the power people feeling the need to cut them down
    *I would definately try to get a handle on whether there is going to be more development between the house and the power lines
    -Will winter affect being able to see the towers?
    -Someone mentioned upgrading - you might want to call the electric company and get an idea of whether they will be upgrading - although it will be hard to find any office or employee that has a clue, you will have to have patience and persistance

    The risk thing - hard to know. When I was younger I used to worship at sciences feet. As I've gotten older I find scientists tend to be arrogant and absolute. When new findings throw out previous findings which is the nature of science, they don't even blink. They just tout the new findings as the now absolute last word with the same arrogance.
    I try to do research with information from all sides and apply some common sense and gut feeling. You have to do what feels right for you and don't let anyone make you feel bad for it.

    Resale - Given a choice I would prefer not to be near power lines. That is of course getting harder to do. You need to really evaluate the bigger picture of the areas people "like you" are looking at. Sounds like schools etc. are important. How many "good" neighborhoods in your price range are affected by a negative (hwy, power lines etc.) Do people have choices?

    Lkplatow comments:
    madmartian - I'm in surburban Philadelphia -- close enough to NJ to have the same problems I guess. Too much development, not enough land....

    Really the elephant in the room everyone is ignorning is population growth. Although of course I realize a lot of people with chime in with population moving around - growth (whereever it happens) still is a bottom line problem.

  • graywings123
    15 years ago

    I don't understand why people dredge up year old threads.

  • handymac
    15 years ago

    This is late, I know----but. I worked for a local electric utility for 22+ years. The building in which I worked was 50 feet from high voltage transmission lines---167,000 volts. Those are the huge metal towers with monstrous lines and long lines of insulators. I don't know of any larger in town lines.

    There have been no incidents of any abnormal sickness. No cancers---and that includes the folks working with PCB's that used to be in transformers.

    The only effect of electrical lines is a correspondingly sized magnetic field around each line---that is true for outside lines on a pole or each of the wires in an extension cord or plug in cord on a light/etc.

    Now, the eyesore part----yeah, I agree. But it is a necessary eyesore---and often neighbors get so used to the sight, it ceases to bother them.

  • patty_cakes
    15 years ago

    Graywings, they don't look at the date. I usually don't either, just make a post. That was until last week over on conversations:someone dredged up a year old post, and techicolor_cottage took note of the date, a YEAR to the day! Is that ironic or WHAT? ;o)

  • jehovasneaky3007_yahoo_com
    13 years ago

    We are also looking at a house that is foreclosed but the acre lot next door has the power lines running through it. From the corner house to the tower is over 400 feet. Is that too close to buy the house?

  • brickeyee
    13 years ago

    "From the corner house to the tower is over 400 feet. Is that too close to buy the house?"

    Depends on how hysterical folks are in the area.

    Keep in mind the leading cause of death: Living.

    No study has shown a dose-response relationship with EMF.

    Not a single one.

    If they are dangerous the closer you are the worse it would be.

    Add to that the crappy science used like wore codes that try to estimate fields based on appearance.

    It is not very hard to measure the actual field strength for research, bit it is just beyond the capability of many of the 'researchers.'

    It does require a fixed sensor though.
    Camera tripods are perfectly suitable.
    Simply holding the pick up in your hand is not steady enough since the movement of your body affects the readings (they are that small).

  • jane__ny
    13 years ago

    I live two blocks from huge power towers which carry electric from upstate NY through to Manhattan. Luckily this area is very hilly and wooded so from my street you cannot see the towers. But the houses near the towers are very difficult to sell.

    Young people do not want to raise their children near these large electrical towers no matter what science proves. I have lived here 36 years and we are all alive and healthy. But my daughter would never buy a house near high power lines. I spent a year house-shopping with her, and the Realtor knew not to show her a house within viewing distance of these electrical lines.

    In my area, it definitely affects resale as does radon and asbestos. Big 'no-no's' with young buyers.

  • ballysharon
    13 years ago

    We just saw an absolutely gorgeous condo (very very reasonably priced) but it had those hideous towers right next door! Plus the complex was in the middle of an industrial area. Totally a deal breaker....sigh. The condo was so beautiful, too :(

  • IdaClaire
    13 years ago

    "I TOLD You So!"


  • Jean Mueller
    5 years ago

    The middle ground...

    If you want a good giggle try reading through this. : ) It is the most recent publication (1992) from the EPA and taken from the government website.

    There is cool info like: some animals have developed the ability to sense low EMF levels and use them in hunting. Read on and it talks about dental work acting up…dear lord, really? In reading this it seems most surreal. Parts where it reads “this subject has not been studied very much…” makes for weird and odd flights of my imagination. : ) Go to the EPA site and read for yourself. Just because something has not been established like EMF exposure simply can not be made definitively safe or unsafe. There you go, you are all possibly right and also possibly wrong.