High efficiency isn't necessarily better for everyone????

9 years ago

My heat broke and I have struggling with new system choices. Since energy efficiency nowadays is so much emphasized, I THOUGHT replacing the old 8 seers 3 ton unit with 16 or higher 3 ton is going to use less energy in the future than before. However, after reading about "load calculation," my 1700 sq ft house may not need a 3 ton higher seer unit, especially with my life style.

My house is always very humid even in winter, now rh about 60%, because I use the washer to wash sweaters, wool sucks, and down coats, and AIR DRY them in winter. I boil water all the time and almost merely steam almost all foods. I set lower temperature in winter and higher temperature in summer, compare with most of Americans. In winter, our heat almost never is running at night, because we love tuck ourselves in a heavy comforter, which makes our sleep better (more like hibernation).

So.... I would say that higher seer units are more efficient for more extreme climates, while I live in GA. Summer and winter here is so mild. The usage of the unit is much less. A higher seer unit, like 16, would not energy saving anymore in my house condition, right???

What seer would you recommend to me, living in a pretty much maximum energy saving environment already?

Although I haven't had someone to do the load calculation yet, do you think it's more sensible to go for a 2.5 ton rather than a 3, due to humidity level being so high in my house?

Thanks a bunch

Sort by:Oldest

Comments (9)

mike_home
9 years ago
How type of heating system do you have and what fuel do you use?

What are you annual costs to heat and cool your house? How much is the cost of electricity and the heating fuel you use?

I thought the summers in Georgia were hot and humid, but you say they are mild. What is a average high temperatures in the summer?

If you provide more information you will get better guidance.
chueh
Original Author
9 years ago
LOL... mike_home. yep, I guess that everybody's point of ivew of comfort is different. To me, GA is very mild, although people say that it's humid and hot. I lived in Miami before, so I have the comparison. Comparing to the north states, the winter is so mild.

August temp: between 90-95 average....
December + January: between 20-55...

Unlike many people who set their t-stat at 72 degree for winter, while wearing a t-shirt. I feel better to wear layers in winter, so I don't like to feel the EXTREME changes between indoors and outdoors.

We use electricity for the entire house, no gas or other fuel system.

I am not sure how to separate the cost of merely heat and AC from the annual electricity cost! I have never calculate the kwh of the HVAC. Anyway, here is the total usage annually, if that would help you to figure out to answer your question for me:

Jan 800 kwh
Feb 1000
Mar 880
Apr 450
May 450
Jun 650
Jul 580
Aug 790
Sep 570
Oct 400
Nov 570
Dec 1000
* This past December reached up to 1200, because the heat pump was acting up and iced up while it was running for no heat.....

See... our electricity usage is not much compared to most people's. So....high energy efficient wouldn't help, right?
Related Discussions
High Efficiency Install Issues
Q
Comments (18)
Your old GE furnace is about 65% AFUE. Replacing it with a 95% AFUE unit will save you about ~$575/ year if your gas is from PSE&G and savings will be ~$665 if your gas supplier is South Jersey Gas Co. PSE$G= $1.40/ therm. South Jersey Gas $1.61/ therm. Electric in NJ is ~$.14/ kWh Rebates from NJ utilities will be $400.00 for a 90%+ AFUE furnace with an ECM blower, $300.00 For a 90%+ furnace with a conventional blower. South Jersey Gas is offering an additional $300.00 in rebates for 90%+ furnaces, expires on 11/30/2007. You will be eligible for a $200.00 tax credit for a 95% furnace with an ECM blower. The ECM blower will save you about $100.00/ year in electric. I see no venting problems with your photos. If your contractor will not install a 90%+ furnace find one who will. If you are buying an A/C system, 15 SEER is the best buy over 14 SEER. The state will rebate $400.00 for 15 SEER, 12.5 EER. and $300.00 for the 14 SEER. The difference is the TXV on the coil. You will also be able to take a $300.00 tax credit for the 15 SEER. Most folks reading this site do not know of the rebate programs in NJ.
...See More
Geotherm vs uber high efficiency gas
Q
Comments (6)
Cschmelz, I gather you're in the Spokane area? I'm in Missoula, and I have a Climatemaster Tranquility 27, installed two years ago. It provides heat and air conditioning for our century old stucco bungalo. You might be able to find some of my old posts by searching this forum. I noted just a couple of things in your post. First off, I thought the price for the basic heat pump installation with ground loops was pretty reasonable for this sort of thing. Second, I wondered why your contractor felt the necessity for adding a solar collector to improve the performance during the winter. My thought, and I may well be wrong, is that if the ground loop is large enough and deep enough you should have no need to help it with the water-to-water/solar collector, which stirked me as Rube Goldbergish. (Keep It Simple, Stupid). That assumes, of course, that your 10 tons of heating/cooling is sufficient. As for hot water you may well find that with the desuperheater on at least one of your Climatemasters that you don't need a very large or even efficient water heater. Again, I may well be wrong, but if that heat pump is properly sized and installed and backs up a conventional 40-50 gallon gas water heater you'll have everything you need. Of course, if you have three teenagers you'll need all the hot water you can get, and all my guesses are hereby withdrawn. Caveat: I ain't no engineer or installer, and there are better minds than mind on this forum, but that's my two bits for what it's worth. Good luck, Mark
...See More
Does anyone else worry their kitchen isn't as sophisticated?
Q
Comments (81)
I hang around this and a few other forums even though I haven't remodeled my kitchen since 2003. Well, actually, it was 1989/90 when we gutted the house and the "new" kitchen was installed. In 2003 all we did was put in new flooring and countertops...my initial amateur attempt at kitchen design in 1989 actually turned out pretty well. A few mistakes but nothing earthshattering. Maybe I was just lucky. Actually, in our neighborhood we ARE the Joneses. The only other people who have installed fancy new kitchens are the ones who bulldozed the original small house and popped up a larger duplex atop our bigger-than-average city lots. Most long-time homeowners in my area are using original 1930's and 1940's kitchens. With the downturn in the market I don't foresee many remodels taking place here. This is a starter neighborhood; Ikea cabs are considered fancy (which they are, compared to the built-in-place flimsy wood originals most HO have). Because my kitchen is nicely functional, but also 19 yrs old and done on the proverbial shoestring (okay, maybe two shoestrings), it lacks many design and style features I see in photos (both pro and amateur) nowadays. Big kitchens and pro-style appliances weren't around when I was originally running up my credit cards at Home Depot. But I feel lucky; most of my family and friends are suffering with their much more dated, much less functional original kitchens. I have 30' of countertop space, and wonderful Kraftmaid frameless semi-custom cabs, with spice pullouts, roll-out double pantries, EZ reach upper corners, Lazy Susan corner bases - all useful things that are way beyond what even remodeled kitchens have around here, and are only dreams for most of my neighbors. They envy our double-pane picture windows, high ceilings, recessed lights - heck, most of them don't even have an exhaust fan! If I had a spare $50K, or even $35K, I'd update this kitchen into something more photo-worthy. But the layout would remain exactly the same. It would just be "window-dressing". Fun, but not worth doing unless I have nothing better to do with the money (and I do, since we'll need a new roof and furnace in the next 5 yrs, LOL - gotta do those things first!). I love buying kitchen magazines for the same reason I hang around these forums. Because I haven't done a kitchen top-to-bottom in quite a while, I learn a lot about how things have changed, what's new on the market, what to do and what not to do, etc. etc. Since this isn't our 'forever' house (not designed for easy maintenance when elderly), I figure at some point I might be remodeling another kitchen (shudder) someday. I like to keep up on things, and I enjoy looking at other people's kitchens, just for the fun of it. Even if much of it is not to my taste, it is always enjoyable to see what others are doing and congratulate them on a job well-done. Remodeling is hard work, mentally exhausting (and physically so if you're a DIYer) and often demoralizing. It is great to see stories shared here, advice freely given, and generous doses of sympathy when needed, amongst strangers.
...See More
comparison of new high efficiency gas water heaters
Q
Comments (6)
The hyrdonic air heating systems were designed to do exactly that- use the same water for both, as it is completely potable by virtue of doign nothing more than circulating through a set of auxilliary coils over which the same air handler that the AC uses in the summer dispencses it. This is not a fringes kind of set up, it just isn't widely used in redidential but has been used commercially for many years. Our issue is to save money as a by product of possibly changing the way we "condition" our air to not be using the MOST EXPENSIVE way to do it. It wasn't the original foremost thought. We thought that the water heater had to have gotten very inefficient over the course of 15 years, or that we had had a gas leak in the underground line from the tank for 15 years. Neither of those proved to be the case. gas comp(not cost) has always been this high. So either this particular water heater is a fuel hog, and supposedly any of them of that vintage should be compared to these new ones, or it has been suggested that it could have had a problem witht the cold wter inlet tube all along. Only way to find that out is to disconnnect and haul it out to check because it cannot be checkd in the palce it resides. Hence the research into the ne high efficiency units that alas, cost some variation of the king's ransom. IF, and that's a big IF, they actually could save 1/3- 1/2 of the gas we are using , then one of them could be a consideration despite cost, since the idea of using water that is already always hot is sensible and the heat is great. If they would not save enough money to eventually make them worth it, then using this one till it dies and then going to a heat pump system seems like a better idea all around. Propane will not be going down but the electricity rate is so low that even if it goes up, it wil never catch up. Brewbeer, I have now talked to an actual Polaris dealer/installer who has done them for years and he says tht poor installation is the cause for most of the problems they have had. He also said that in their earlier years there were some design issues that have been changed, making them even better. I was trying to get a handle on comparing the others- Apollo, Vertex, and Bock. There is a Bradford White one that is made for this kind of air space heat as well, so I would welcome info on that as well, TW2. Keep the ideas coming and thanls!
...See More
mike_home
9 years ago
The decision to invest in more efficiency comes down to how long is the pay back period. Your energy usage does not seem high, and your electric rate is probably low to average, so the pay back period may be very long.

Just a few things to consider. For AC condensers the minimum SEER rating allowed by federal law is 13. A SEER rating of 15-16 is considered the best value in terms of initial cost and energy savings. The low end equipment may have a 13 SEER rating, be built of cheap materials, and have very basic features. You are better off buying quality equipment. Usually it also means better efficiency.

The size should be determined by a load calculation. If the 3 ton worked well, then it is probably the right size. If you want better humidity control in the summer, I suggest getting a 2-stage condenser. These only come in whole ton sizes and usually have higher efficiency ratings.
chueh
Original Author
9 years ago
OK....So...Mike_home, even for my low electricity usage and life style, 15-16 is still the best value, due to they are "better built" even with a reputable manufacturer like Carrier?
mike_home
9 years ago
I would avoid buying the bottom line units.

FYI - The SEER rating is determined by the combination of the condenser, coil, and handler. It also changes when you move up and down in size with the same equipment.

Don't get so focused on buying a SEER rating. Stick with the one of the better brands, get it sized correctly, and find a contractor who can do a good installation.
chueh
Original Author
9 years ago
OK thanks...
joe_mn
9 years ago
You have a heat pump now? Maybe in my world I assume all heat pumps are high efficiency? You also say you have all electric service so you have an electric water heater? Seems to me that is a huge energy device.
pbx2_gw
9 years ago
Unlike many people who set their t-stat at 72 degree for winter, while wearing a t-shirt. I feel better to wear layers in winter, so I don't like to feel the EXTREME changes between indoors and outdoors.

Isn't this the truth?! Wear some layer & lower it down to 68 & people would see savings in their bills.
countryboymo
9 years ago
Well if you step up to a decent efficiency (15) seer that has good ahri numbers that match you will probably get a txv as standard equipment instead of a piston orifice which helps cut humidity which will make whatever temp is comfortable in summer now feel cooler possibly allowing a higher set temp. It will also probably come with demand defrost which will save you more in winter than you might think if you use a heat pump. If it is above freezing my system rarely goes into defrost unless something is falling from the sky and its below freezing. A builders grade 13 seer will defrost on a timed system defrosting after every 30/60 or 90 minutes of accrued run time and some run for a full 10 minute cycle. Most systems have oversized heat strips so every defrost burns $$ in comparison to none.

I think you would be happy either way.. The better system will pay you back with better comfort and quieter operation with a probable longer lifespan and better warranty.

It seems either way a new system is going in. Don't forget to calculate the cost differential between the options.

High efficiency isn't necessarily better for everyone????

Comments (9)

mike_home

chueh
Original Author

Related Discussions

mike_home

chueh
Original Author

mike_home

chueh
Original Author

joe_mn

pbx2_gw

countryboymo

COMPANY

BUSINESS SERVICES

GET HELP

CONNECT WITH US

High efficiency isn't necessarily better for everyone????

Comments (9)

mike_home

chuehOriginal Author

Related Discussions

mike_home

chuehOriginal Author

mike_home

chuehOriginal Author

joe_mn

pbx2_gw

countryboymo

COMPANY

BUSINESS SERVICES

GET HELP

CONNECT WITH US

chueh
Original Author

chueh
Original Author

chueh
Original Author