Thanks meldy! I do have many places. I had this guy who has been working with my dear friend, who lost her husband very suddenly last year, helping me. I've been to the SSI retirement symposium so that I could hear what I might need to tell mom who is just about to retire (age 70 next year), and what I might start doing to position myself. I saw him in action there; he was giving the right advice. "Don't take Medicare until as late as possible", if nothing else, but there was more, and he was right on. I've been teaching my son that too, showing him how compound interest was the most important part, so much so, that he could invest X, by age X, and if it averaged X, then he'd have millions by the time he retired (way earlier than 65), even if he quit at a certain point... that he wanted to start now and doesn't plan to quit investing in it. He started his retirement nest egg at age 8 (three years ago), and will put it into his first CD by the mid-year next year ($1,000 minimum), which is pretty good because he started out with getting only $15 a month for everything he does, and although it's up to $45, that's all he ever get. Anything else, he'll have to work a job (to pay for a car, gas, insurance, designer clothes, etc.). He's never taken anything out of the retirement fund because he has another savings that he takes from when he wants the "big" things and already has spending money set aside. I think he'll do it. As long as some wretch doesn't get her hands on it later on. It has been fast because we knew how to pare down, set aside exactly what was needed for the bare bills, save as much as possible, and some small amount is now being added as investment. Some time next year, they'll get switched. The bigger savings will be all investment fund with a bit going into CDs. And I'll go back to my own personal having-fun-with-the-stock-market investing. I can make big bucks with that, even when the market is down. And God is good. That too. Moreso, because of that. :)

Thanks jose and steve for the confirmation and advice! I like the idea of VanGuard or Fidelity and will check out both more thoroughly. I actually have about 25 years to retirement and will be increasing my retirement savings each year. Would love to save 25% but my income is low and I'm already living rather frugally (not a shopper, no vacations, no credit card debt, 3 month emergency fund)! For the last 4 years I have been saving (IRA/Roth) just over 10% of my gross income. My income is low enough that I have qualified for the maximum Saver's Credit (which is why some savings is in an IRA and some in a Roth). In the next year I will be re-entering the regular world of work (after being self-employed for 15 years). And while I have earned a living and loved being self-employed I have decided to do this so that I have better health insurance plan and work for a company that offers a 401K with a company match. My total saved is about $10,000 and the split is actually about $4000 in a regular IRA and $6000 in a Roth IRA. My thoughts are that I should invest the $4000 IRA in something that is relatively stable and I should invest the $6000 Roth in something that offers the opportunity for a greater return (especially since there is no tax on Roth earnings at withdrawl once I retire). At this time I am not looking to convert the regular IRA into a Roth IRA. Knowing the split ... $4000 IRA and $6000 Roth what the best option for each?

I think you have a misapprehension. Withdrawals from Roths are tax-free, because they're funded with after-tax dollars and are allowed to be tax-free by law. If you want to transfer regular IRA money into a Roth, that non-Roth money has not been taxed and you have to pay taxes on it for the privilege of converting it to a Roth. In the long run, this will typically be a good deal...but it ain't free. If you want a Roth and you make less than $100K/year, you can always fund a Roth directly; you'll just need to do it with after-tax dollars. And I believe that all the Tax Reform Act did was to remove the income ceiling on who could do this, meaning that rich people have had one more benefit provided to them. Here is a link that should help explain: Here is a link that might be useful: Roth

I had seen an article on this subject in the WSJ, so I needed to do a search to pull it up again. Here's the pros and cons: WSJournal Investing, November 2, 2008 IRAs May Be Ripe For Shift to Roth One of the simplest ways to take advantage of the continuing market turmoil: Convert your battered investments from a traditional individual retirement account to a Roth IRA. When you convert traditional IRA assets to a Roth, you have to pay the income taxes upfront on the account's value -- and in some cases, those values may be next to nothing at the moment. With a Roth IRA, there are generally no taxes on withdrawals or any future earnings, unlike with traditional IRAs. There's also no mandatory distribution schedule -- again in contrast with traditional IRAs, from which account holders must begin taking minimum distributions by April 1 of the year following the year they turn 70 years old. Plus, you can leave a Roth account intact for your heirs. (Heirs other than your spouse would have to take required withdrawals each year, but they generally wouldn't owe any tax on them.) To be eligible to convert traditional IRA assets to a Roth, your income must be $100,000 or less. So any hit that your paycheck has taken from the economic downturn might help you do a Roth conversion. (Starting in 2010, there is no longer an income limit for Roth conversions.) Neither a required IRA distribution nor the converted amount would count against the $100,000 income limit. If you are 70½ or older, you have to take this year's required distribution before converting any traditional IRA assets to a Roth. Withdrawal Rules Many IRA holders get tangled up in the "five-year" rule when they convert IRA assets to a Roth IRA: You have to hold those assets in a Roth for five years or until you turn 59½, whichever comes first, to make penalty-free withdrawals of converted amounts. Each conversion has its own five-year clock. But if you have already reached age 59½ and you convert traditional IRA assets to a Roth, you can withdraw the actual assets you convert at any time without worrying about a five-year deadline or penalties. It's a different story with any earnings on those assets: Again, you must have held a Roth account for five years to withdraw any earnings tax-free. But you don't need to worry about separating the converted funds from the earnings; that's because the withdrawal rules for Roth IRAs say that any distributions first come from contributions, then from conversions, and finally from earnings, says Ed Slott, an IRA consultant in Rockville Centre, N.Y. Chuck Bauer, a 62-year-old manager in Pittsburgh for Aker Solutions, an engineering and construction company, has a combination of market losses and lower-than-normal income this year. So he is taking the advice of a local financial planner, Bud Kahn, and converting his IRA to a Roth, he says. Mr. Bauer will have to pay about $29,000 in income tax on the conversion, but "we think the account has gone down about $32,000," says Mr. Kahn. "When the account recoups its losses, he will have made up the taxes that he paid. And then that recoupment is never going to be taxed again." Changing Your Mind What if you converted traditional IRA assets to a Roth earlier this year, and those assets have declined in value? In that case, you may want to "recharacterize" the Roth as a traditional IRA. It's a way, says Mr. Slott, to "erase the taxes" on value that has since disappeared. Frank Russo, a 66-year-old Verizon Communications retiree in Port Washington, N.Y., recharacterized IRA investments that he had converted to a Roth after watching their value fall at least 15%. "I don't have to pay tax on an amount that no longer exists," he says. To do a recharacterization,you have to use a "trustee-to-trustee" transfer, also called a direct rollover or direct transfer, to move the contribution from one IRA to another. Don't touch the money yourself, and make sure no checks get made out directly to you or deposited in your bank account. The assets are treated as if they never left the traditional IRA, Mr. Slott says. If you recharacterize your Roth as a traditional IRA by Nov. 30, you could then convert the lower-value assets to a Roth again as soon as Jan. 1, he adds. See IRS Publication 590, at www.irs.gov, for information about traditional and Roth IRAs.