Forget Inflation! Market Fundamentals are Appalling

18 years ago

Market Fundamentals are Appalling

{{gwi:1520954}}

Read Thread

http://www.investmentpostcards.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/27-june-1.jpg

As recommended by John Mauldin;

'Montier and Edwards speak quite forcefully about the problems they see in the market today, and they are truly Outside the Box thinkers.'

'They are, in a word, skeptics, and at this juncture most deeply skeptical of any and all notions that 'the worst is over.' The recession, which has barely begun, is more likely to be deep than shallow, market valuations are hideously expensive and the -flation policymakers should be worried about starts with de-, not in-. For their reasons, keep reading, if you dare.'

Interesting...

Cheers,

Dave Donhoff

Leverage Planner

Here is a link that might be useful: Market Fundamentals are Appalling

Sort by:Oldest

Comments (10)

lucy
18 years ago
Dave - maybe others won't say anything, but while you've been very helpful to people about their finances in general, this (and another one) post is more or less spam and I guess no one wants to get into it... even if the info might be good. Spam is just not done here.
dave_donhoff
Original Author
18 years ago
Lucy,
What are you talking about? Do you know what SPAM is?

If so, how do you see my contributions as SPAMming?

Random groundless accusations are just not done here (or at least they are quite rare anymore ;~)

Cheers,
Dave Donhoff
Leverage Planner
Related Discussions
American Ag is really changing!
Q
Comments (21)
"myk1, the price of corn is not set by the farmer based on his costs to produce, it is an openly traded commodity and the price reflects supply vs demand." A few years ago the costs of harvesting, transporting and storage were too high for what the price corn was bringing. The corn was dumped in fields and even along side of roads. If it's not worth harvesting there is nobody holding a gun to the farmer's heads making them take a loss. No other business in this country is a forced charity like that. They dump to cut supply which drives up prices. Now that there is more demand with ethanol there is no need to dump or till under. If anything the extra corn being grown to jump on the bandwagon is lowering prices compared to where it should be (but that is offset this year because of the floods). I'm all for farmers getting paid a good income. Not that I believe the poverty stricken farmer stories but with the amount of financial investment and labor it takes to farm they deserve to be very well off. There are a lot of bad farmers/businessmen who wait until it's too late but the smart ones are thinking ahead. Doesn't what you say contradict that it's the ethanol causing prices to increase? If the cost of fuel going up doesn't make the cost of corn go up then the cost of corn going up shouldn't make the cost of beef go up. This doesn't effect me and fruit growing. I learned a long time ago that store bought weren't a good substitute for homegrown, I don't buy fruit if I have a bad year (the same goes for corn on the cob). I'm planting more apples (now it's up to 4 more instead of 3) because I want apples not because I need them. The only way I'll notice the price increases is if I get extras and sell them instead of give them away. I have a bunch of filters on my email plus my address changed. I was getting those last year and I've always got them at my spam address.
...See More
This all this financial mess makes me sick!
Q
Comments (25)
Whoa, I think the conversations are going OT here - let's get back to Phoggie's concerns, which in re-reading I note she mentioned wanting to sell her house, but nothing in town is selling. It's pretty clear the current environment is to the buyer's advantage, not the sellers. You can certainly sell your house, but you will have to take much less, in some areas up to 25-30% less, than it was worth two years ago. If you can afford to take the hit and absolutely must sell, then find the very best RE agent you can, and make sure you take their advice about how to best market your property. If you can hold on instead, you will be a much better position in a couple of years. The real fall-out is not banks failing or home prices falling, it's the tightening on mortgage applications. A rather large percentage of folks can no longer qualify, as excerpted below from the WSJournal (a link to the full article is provided as well, but you need to be a subscriber to read it): "...But even borrowers who think they're well positioned to be approved for a mortgage "can't assume anything," said Guy Cecala, of Inside Mortgage Finance. And they'd better be prepared to shop around to get the best rates "Cecala estimates that a third of the people who were able to get a loan in 2005 and 2006 no longer qualify for financing today. That takes into account the disappearance of subprime and Alt-A loans as well as the tightened requirements for getting prime mortgages, he said. "Mortgage credit is as tight as we've seen it in a generation," said Cecala, publisher of the industry newsletter. "When does it get looser? When people feel that the housing market is stabilized, and that's really not going to happen until we start seeing an end to rising defaults and foreclosures, and housing prices have stabilized in markets throughout the country." "If he had to guess, it'll be another year before getting a mortgage becomes any easier. "In some cases, lenders are even looking beyond the numbers for proof not only that an applicant has a job with a steady income stream but is also likely to keep that job, said Bob Moulton, president of Americana Mortgage Group on Long Island, N.Y....." It's a rough time for many. Watch your expenses, take care of your health (maintenance being many times more cheap than procrastination). Talk to your neighbors or friends about ways you can save money together, even in little ways. Look at your town/city with new eyes, there might be free events you passed by before - if you give them a try, it will at least be something different, and you won't be out any big $$. And you might find something new and interesting this way, that you would have missed otherwise. Get together with a friend, take a walk in good weather and just talk. Come back home for coffee and a home-made coffeecake. Someone posted on the Caregivers forum about a friend whose DH was just given 2 months more to live - it reminds you that truly, the best things in life have little to do with money. Here is a link that might be useful: WSJournal article (subscribers only)
...See More
Food prices - are they really going up that much?
Q
Comments (66)
Jim, the money supply can go up but if velocity is down, it doesn't drive inflation. I've linked below to an article on this. And how much is the money supply going up, really? The Fed is trying to drive up money supply, but the private sector is pulling it down. You can find charts of money supply, here is one: http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/money-supply-charts Money supply has declined quite significantly in the past couple years. dcarch, no question the rapid growth of China and India is adding to demand. However, that growth is coming from a very low level. The consumption of goods and services by the average person in China or India is far, far less than the consumption of the average person in the US, Europe and Japan. Use GDP per capita as a rough proxy for consumption. India is about $3,500, China about $7,000 vs US about $46,000, Western Europe and Japan about $35,000. China's population is 1.3bn, India's 1.2bn, US 311mm, Western Europe 500mm (use the EU), Japan 127mm. So we can get the GDP of each region. Suppose China and India's GDP grows 60% in the next 5 years, which is 10% per year (about the current rate) while the US, Western Europe and Japan's GDP only grows 10% over the period or 2% per year (unfortunately, also about the current rate if not better). The result would be the combined GDP grows 24% over the period or 4% per year. (approximate, I don't have a spreadsheet here, just an iPhone and a pencil). (We could use other proxies for consumption, like energy consumption per capita. Which is why I did the above as a per capita calculation, instead of simply starting with country GDP.) Can the world supply 4% more ''stuff'' per year without driving inflation to very high levels? Overall, sure. There is plenty of production capacity in electronics and plastic molding and LCD screens to supply (far more than) 4% growth in iPhones and similar. There is plenty of assembly and component manufacturing capacity to supply (more than) 4% growth in automobiles. Similar for concrete to make housing, fiberboard to make furniture, etc. 4% will not stress global capacity, especially after a deep recession as we've just had. We'll see periods of volatility in some prices, as supply and demand adjust. Pork, rice, cotton, etc. This volatility will be upwards and downwards, but the price rises will get more media attention. Remember a couple of years ago, when rice was skyrocketing in price, countries were hoarding, everyone was talking about rice shortages? Rice soared to $22. Then it fell to $12, that didn't get much news. Rose to $16. Fell to $10. Rose to $14. Yet during the period 2008 to present, as rice price were cut in half, China and India have continued to grow and consume more of everything - and they eat a lot of rice. The commodities that are soaring today will collapse the same way. Commodities are more volatile today, their prices moving more than fundamental demand-supply would suggest, because more investors are playing those markets, and financial money flows are huge compared to the relatively small commodities markets. In the end, fundamentals still control. Here is a link that might be useful: Article
...See More
Homes Sales Worse Than Anticipated
Q
Comments (46)
berniek - I'm interested in your 3 vs. 5 yr comment. Is this in part based on region or just generally based on recouping closing costs etc? I'm not bernie, but in the past it was sort of a rule of thumb that you needed to stay in a house about 5 years in order to make enough to cover closing costs, commissions, etc., and not necessarily make a profit. Unfortunately with the recent run up in prices in some areas people think that they should walk away with tens of thousands of dollars after only being in their homes for a couple of years. In fact that was the reasoning that many lenders gave to push the sale of 100%, ARMs and interest only loans. They were telling buyers that in a couple of years they would be able to refinance to a fixed rate because they would have so much equity because of rising prices. With prices NOT going up at such a rapid (and unsustainable pace) many are finding their mortgages have adjusted beyond their ability to pay.
...See More
lucy
18 years ago
It looks like you're selling your services, but if I'm wrong, then I apologize.
nycefarm_gw
18 years ago
No Lucy, he is not selling anything, he is educating us without personal gain. I value his opinion...
dave_donhoff
Original Author
18 years ago
Hi Lucy,

OK... let's call a spade a shovel; YES... I am a service professional and I do sell my financial services. YES, people can (and do) decide to contact me for help after they've read my postings... and I like that ;~)

HOWEVER; if you'll actually read the content of the posts you find from me, you'll see that I am very disciplined to *NEVER* sell, promote nor solicit my services in the communities.

I figure that just being generous with answers to questions, and contributing the raw and polished information that I read & find valuable daily, is enough for some people to see who I am, and perhaps decide if they want to find me & chat with me more, ofboards, whenever that time comes.

The post here you are responding to has no content about me whatsoever... and I hope it didn't offend you.

Cheers,
Dave Donhoff
Leverage Planner
dreamgarden
18 years ago
nycefarm-"No Lucy, he is not selling anything, he is educating us without personal gain. I value his opinion..."

I do too.
behaviorkelton
18 years ago
Deflation? Wow! That would certainly be a change in direction.

So who benefits (or survives) in a deflationary market?

Does this mean a dollar would be worth more?

Is deflation more worrisome than inflation?
(maybe I should read that link... but it looks too much like a "come on")
ian_bc_north
18 years ago
Hello Kelton,
In a deflationary environment people put off major purchases because they expect prices to fall.
The result is lower economic activity and higher unemployment.
In a deflationary environment cash is king.
The people who benefit are those who get a regular income in cash which will buy more.
The last period of extended deflation in North America was the Great Depression which for many is the defining economic disaster of the last 100 years in North America.

I would suggest that for people in Zimbabwe inflation is part of the defining economic disaster there.
dave_donhoff
Original Author
18 years ago
Hi Kelton,

So who benefits (or survives) in a deflationary market?

Be definition, a deflationary environment is when hard assets become less valuable relative to cash. Thus, those who are more liquid in cash or its equivalents benefit.

Does this mean a dollar would be worth more?

Exactly... and in some markets you can already see this in spades.

In San Diego, for example, if you have $500,000 you can buy almost twice as much home today than 3 years ago. That directly makes the dollar itself twice as valuable (in that market.)

Is deflation more worrisome than inflation?

Nope... just different. If you understand it, you can manage your life within it.

NOW: BEWARE!!!
We are almost never in a UNIVERSALLY deflationary nor inflationary environment!

Currently we can see a bifurcation of inflation/deflation in some areas, and an almost neutral environment in others.

Consumed commodities are experiencing INFLATION... which is to say that a dollar buys less gasoline, less wheat, and less bananas.

Hard assets are experiencing DEFLATION (as in the above San Diego example,) HOWEVER... the degree of deflation is relative to the local areas in the case of real estate.

The measured response by the Federal Reserve and Treasury (namely, the non-manipulation of short term interest rates,) has it appear that soft-asset deflation and hard asset inflation are roughly cancelling each other out enough to avoid monkeying from the high-authority side.

IN SHORT, the markets ACTUALLY seem to be sorting themselves out in just about the most orderly and organized fashion we could have ever have hoped for, where the sequential deflationary popping of the stock markets in 2000, and then the real estate and credit markets in 2007/2008 are being counterbalanced by fairly non-catastrophic inflation in the consumer markets.

cheers,
Dave Donhoff
Leverage Planner
stinkbone
18 years ago
But in reference to the original post here...congress is bailing out the morgage mess with fixed FHA loans up to 115% LTV; as early as today congress will vote on regulating oil markets to curb speculation which may bring the cost down to $80 a barrel; my citigroup stock has gone up 50% in a week. Maybe the worst is over...

Forget Inflation! Market Fundamentals are Appalling

Comments (10)

lucy

dave_donhoff
Original Author

Related Discussions

lucy

nycefarm_gw

dave_donhoff
Original Author

dreamgarden

behaviorkelton

ian_bc_north

dave_donhoff
Original Author

stinkbone

COMPANY

BUSINESS SERVICES

GET HELP

CONNECT WITH US

Forget Inflation! Market Fundamentals are Appalling

Comments (10)

lucy

dave_donhoffOriginal Author

Related Discussions

lucy

nycefarm_gw

dave_donhoffOriginal Author

dreamgarden

behaviorkelton

ian_bc_north

dave_donhoffOriginal Author

stinkbone

COMPANY

BUSINESS SERVICES

GET HELP

CONNECT WITH US

dave_donhoff
Original Author

dave_donhoff
Original Author

dave_donhoff
Original Author