After 3 weekends of small things disappearing I installed a trail cam just in time to catch this thief going big, just this past weekend. $650 well spent as the value of things taken were around $2500. He even took our paint and floor finish! Its almost always someone that had something to do with the job. In this case it was a kid working for the roofer. I got most of the things back and will be delighted to see him go to jail as he is under investigation for a similar incident. It takes this kind of physical evidence to get a conviction. The reconyx 950 got about 40 pics of him. I didnt even realize he had gone in through the window until I reviewed the pics later..

It hard to determine cause without the specific error the sender got in return. However, assuming the problem is indeed your email account I would suggest creating a e-mail address with a different email provider and then sending an e-mail to your normal account. If that doesn't work I'll need the error message. If not, try asking the individual who sent the email to this secondary account and if it works then we can move from there and if doesn't work I don't think the individual is sending any e-mails to you due to either being labeled as a spam email address or their SMTP has been black listed by your email provider or their SMTP has been black listed your email provider. Normally, I would ask the sender to do a reverse Dns to ensure mail is getting through, but, I get the feeling that is outside the expectations of the employees who work at this funeral home.

Hi, Bob Thanks for the reply and the screen shot, but I think you may have misunderstood. Your shot seems to be of the login page (with the red key). I'm referring to the actual webmail interface after you log in. (See link below.) Notice that the site icon at the left of my address bar is now no longer highlighted (colored) as at the login page in your image. But the address itself still shows httpS. Plus, the tool tip underneath the address bar shows an uncertain source. I don't know if that means there is some problem with the actual beta AOL SSL connection (that it's somehow 'not as good/secure') or if it's only 'unverified' for some reason (not sure why, if it's source is the same as the security for the login). Not a big deal for me, since I really don't use AOL much if at all (nor Yahoo, for the same reason: no full-session SSL). But if they are implementing it (finally) I might start using it more, so I thought I'd ask about how trustworthy it is as it stands. Here is a link that might be useful:

I use Open DNS, so this domain was blocked for me. LOL!